![]() |
Is Mary, the Mother of Jesus, Historically Insignificant?
I lifted this little quote from "The Jesus I Never Knew," by Philip Yancey
"The virgin Mary though, whose parenthood was unplanned, had a different response. She heard the angel out, pondered the repercussions, and replied, "I am the Lord's servant. May it be to me as you have said." Often a work of God comes with two edges, great joy and great pain, and in that matter-of-fact response Mary embraced both. She was the first person to accept Jesus on His own terms, regardless of the personal cost." I found Yancey's thought about Mary strikingly beautiful in it's truthfulness. Upon reading it, I wondered if we Pentecostals - because of our opposition to the fictitious doctrinal view of Mary taught by Catholics - have relegated Mary to insignificance. I offer three questions to those interested in the topic at hand. 1. Why did God choose Mary as the incubator for His Son? 2. Is Mary, the mother of Jesus, historically insignificant? 3. Is Mary, the mother of Jesus, the most important bible character - other than her Son? |
Every generation is supposed to be calling her blessed. I have no problem with that. It is a good thing.
Mary the blessed Mother of Jesus. |
Quote:
Knowing the rejection that was ahead, perhaps He wanted to have at least one human anchor, one "safe harbor." Becoming human was something new for Him. I think He wanted to experience humanity in its fullness. Quote:
Quote:
Who's the most important? I have to give the "cop out" answer: whoever I happened to be looking at when you ask. |
To me an important lesson to be learned is look what supernatural things God can do through ordinary people who are yielded to Him.
Since God caused a virgin to conceive it shouldn't be hard for God to do miracles for us in situations that seem impossible to man. |
Quote:
#1. Because she was willing to obey and co-operate with God. #2. Yes #3. She is certainly among the most notable. |
Quote:
If one looks at how she was/is regarded by the Orthodox, from whom the RCC pulled away, it seems there may be a clearer picture of her place. The RCC's doctrine on Mary is recent in the historical church - it wasn't put in place as it is today until the mid-1800's and then expanded at Vatican II, I believe. And they continue to revise it. Some of the Orthodox teachings are that she was the first human to experience the life-changing power of Jesus. They also teach that her life is an example of the kind of life God wants us to lead. They believe that the RCC teaching is heresey and that it demeans the life-changing power that Jesus offers. The Orthodox give her tremendous honor, on the level that they give the Apostles. They do, however, they believe that the RCC has tried to put her on par with God. |
Quote:
Quote:
Mary accepted Him when everyone else, including her betrothed, was rejecting her. She accepted God's will, and the angel's words, without fully knowing the consequences of her decision. She fully trusted the angel. Remarkable. She believed something that had never happened before was possible. |
i believe imoo, that mary was the mother of jesus, greatly blessed and used by god to bring us his son, himself robed in flesh, therefore she has great significance and my thanks, i needed Jesus, and need him now, thanks Mary, dt:hypercoffee
|
Quote:
Catholicism deified and mysticized her beyond biblical recognition. Pentecostalism, historically, has categorically rejected her New Testament influence. How did the early Christian church view her? What is her proper place in twenty-first century bibliology? |
Quote:
Would anyone care to address this post? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.