View Single Post
  #37  
Old 05-15-2013, 08:08 AM
larrylyates larrylyates is offline
Apostolic Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 700
Re: Holiness vs. Legalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livelystone View Post
Have a little respect to the truth larry

Your whole todo to Mary was not needing teachers because we have the scriptures and the Holy Spirit.......... when she pointed out in bold to you that teacher are needed you said the following words

These are your words !!!



And what is your supoport for linking me to this !@#$%^&*()

a myriad of other cults, as well as such tragedies as Jonestown and Waco. All of these were direct results of exactly the kind of thinking you described.


Fair enough?
No Doug, not "fair enough." You continue to misrepresent me. A partial truth is still a complete lie. You very craftily, dissect the statement I made while completely ignoring every single qualifier I offered to her to demonstrate the Biblical role of teachers.

What I said to Marie needs to be seen in context:

Your comment in bold is simply incorrect. The statement you object to, is not my own. It comes directly from the pages of Scripture:

1 John 2:27
But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.


"Ye need not that any man teach you:" does that phrase appear in your Bible or not?

"all of the Scriptures I listed prove that there is nothing hidden from the child of God and that we were given the Holy Spirit to guide us into all truth and have no need that any man teach us."

Can you show me please the linguistic difference between the two statements?

As for your concluding question? None of those remarks were directed toward you. Why are you responding in this way? Those remarks were made in my post to Marie and had nothing to do with you. Nothing at all.

However, two things I would like to call to your attention:

We do not allow any rebuking, hatefulness, name calling, or verbal attacks by any person or group of people, toward any person or group of people. Content that is unseemly, using bad language, or any form of insinuating bad language (i.e. one letter and ****), or offensive slang, is not permitted.

This administration knows that God's Word allows for rebuking and correction under certain conditions, but because of the lack of understanding by some, as well as the differing views by a multitude of readers here, and for the sake of peace, we will not permit it under any circumstances.


You are in direct violation of all of the above. Furthermore, you leave me a bit confused. Your cursing is sin, yet you state that this is simply not possible for those with your level of understanding and abiding in the Spirit.

Your problem with 1 John 2:27 is between you and God. Your objection is to the words of the Holy Writ, not with me. Agree with me or not I don't care, but do not try to deny that God said it.

I too have had issues with some others on this forum. I have had to apologize to several people for allowing my own rhetoric to get out of hand. The ability on AFF to have rational discourse with those of like precious faith is highly impeded. This is apparently the case here. I am sorry for that. In the Early Church the Prophets were subject to one another and everything to be judged according to the Word by the others. You don't seem to respond well to that so I have refrained in the last several weeks from commenting on your posts.
Reply With Quote