Quote:
Originally Posted by RamoneWooddell
The problem is that you are arguing from a moral stand point instead of a constitutional one.
|
Neither moral nor constitutional--my points hinge around intitial comment in thread--to assert that laws, constitutions, and so-called rights are just words until someone is able to back up the intention of law with force. For big issues, big forces often used, such as a military. For other rules, mere shame can be an effective enforcer. US Constitution? It has probably always been only selectively applied.
Yes, I also went for low-hanging fruit just for fun, such as the wrongness of slavery, or other pop-morality slam dunks, etc. Not exactly the issue with CSA. I'm guilty as charged there. But....
Quote:
|
But since you are on a moral rant
|
If my defining an
invisible CSA to be one and the same with a
non-existing CSA is "moral rant," then okay. IMO, this whole silly debate is revolving around what the word "REALLY" means. As in, "The CSA doesn't really exist today."
Quote:
|
Morals are relative to the person holding them.
|
Saints be praised, we do agree about something.
THE END
.