In my "History of Religion in America" class, the thesis for my research paper is,
Quote:
|
Although the United Pentecostal Church International at times stretches the rules of orthodoxy to their limit, the organization cannot be considered a sub-Christian cult.
|
Now before some of you explode, let me say that I realize the term "
orthodox" is subjective. Certainly what we as OP's consider to be "
orthodoxy" is different in some respects to what Evangelicals and "
Classical Pentecostals" consider it to be. However, the school I attend is AG and, for the sake of objectivity, I do not want to come across as an apologist for the UPCI. That should not be difficult since I plan on being transparent about a couple of areas I struggle with in regards the doctrine of that fellowship. The focus of my research will be to analyze whether or not the UPCI is really as unorthodox by Evangelical standards as some claim it is. Having been an Assemblies of God minister in the past, I feel I can offer some unique insights to this topic.
Here's where I need help from some of you on AFF. If anyone has any writings on the life and teaching of Andrew Urshan, that would be helpful. While I realize he was not "UPC" originally, he made some statements at one point that I feel could add to this discussion.
Also, I am looking for some good references on the history of the UPCI, whether they be pro or con.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!