[rdp]

Originally Posted by Truthseeker

So only uncut hair is actively having growing long hair? Wouldn't that mean a man with trimmed hair to his buttocks would not have long hair?

*Ahhh yes, this old familiar equivocation fallacy. What is said for the woman cannot be said for the man since - as this very text plainly states - women are to have long-uncut hair & men are not to have long hair.

*First, you need to actually interact w. the grammatical information if you disagree w. these grammarians. From there, if you have some exegetical data to overthrow all of the linguists I have referenced in this thread - please offer that internal-textual evidence. The verb referenced is active voice. Do you know what that denotes for the subject?

*Until then, I will not chase the usual AFF rabbit trails designed to move away from the inspired biblical language & text. Short or cut hair on a Christian woman is disgraceful - period .