Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen
Did you watch the video or just go with what you read here? Because this was a miniscule portion of what the video was about. Once again he used a principal from the word of God he wasn't saying this is what the passage meant.
|
I have not listened to the video. I responded to your post using
Deuteronomy 32:17. If that verse was only a "miniscule" part of the sermon, why did you use it as the guiding thought for the entire thread?
Secondly, there is no using "a principal from the word of God" apart from what a passage means. That destroys context.
A neighbor's landmark is about a neighbor's landmark, which is about property rights, lines, divisions, and ownership. Since it has nothing to do with 21st century Oneness Pentecostal standards, it should not have been used in the slightest, not even in a miniscule amount, because the two topics have nothing to do with each other.
Finally, if the video is really about something else, or that the main sermon text is not
Deuteronomy 32:17, as you have made it seem, why not simply say so and go with that, from the outset. Otherwise, you have misled us, and even if inadvertently, obfuscated the original intent of the person preaching in the video, just to make a statement here on the forum.