Quote:
Originally Posted by philjones
Would abortionists and murderers qualify from your side of the field... if in fact we are on a field and actually on different sides of it.
I think backslider is mild compared to conservatives being referred to as having the spirit of abortion and murdering unborn children or new born children INTENTIONALLY.
What do you think?
And NO that is not what CS is trying to say. He is saying that those who once embraced the PAJC perspective and now are claiming salvation at repentance have backslidden from the truth they once held dear.
|
I NEVER said all conservatives were this way. I said there is an element in our movement that is this way. And whlie I said last night that I didn't feel it was intentional - I have heard of many super dee duper fruitcakes who masquerade as conservatives that claim to love back-door revivals. What is that, if not spiritual abortion and murder?
Lets get real here! I believe the basic tenants of our doctrine in a huge way.
But I don't drink the Kool-Aid some would like me to. To equate my statements as an abandonment of core doctrine is a huge distortion of the truth.
As for the new breed of the PCI, I am not connected to it, don't understand it, and have never one time identified myself with it.
My question is this: Which is worse, ignoring basic doctrinal tenants, or continually adding new junk and equating it with the gospel?