Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia
YOU JUMP TO QUICKLY! and that is not an attractive trait.... I never said I disagreed with the term, or that the term was going to be thrown out... I said it is a qualified term!!!!!!! I supported that with an article
I take no issue with the term PERSONS...in the proper context....
oneness have their terms as well.... anyone want to define what "holiness" means to your typical apostolic? If she does not follow holiness it means she does not follow the standards
same with persons it is a qualified term
|
It is not attractive to deny what trinitarianism actually is. How can we even debate when you deny that they mean what they say? If a word has no meaning, why use it?
They absolutely believe that "persons" means distinct individuals. Did you read what I posted from the AOG website?