Acts 19 they spoke with tongues, so it can't be used to say tongues is not the initial evidence.
Acts 10 they spoke in tongues and magnified God. Seems essentially the same thing in
Acts 19, as their Spirit inspired praising of God could certainly be called prophesying.
1 Corinthian 12-14 is in the context of people who already have the Spirit and are being used in different ways in the meeting. Paul isn't talking about initial evidence here.
So what is left? It is true God can even make a donkey prophesy in a human language, but I cannot but see the normative rule is tongues as the initial evidence of receiving the Spirit, just going by what Scripture says.
Joel said people would do various things as a result of the Spirit being poured out, but one thing he said they ALL would do is "prophesy", which according to Peter meant speaking with other tongues. So I have to stick with that.