[Steven Avery]

One major problem with the "liar" approach to Ron Wyatt is that two of his major research areas are now largely accepted as the best sites.

Mt. Sinai in Arabia - Jabal al-Lawz
Hershel Shanks, editor for Biblical Archaeology Review, said, “Jabal al-Lawz is the most likely site for Mount Sinai ... ” (2019) in the video "The Search for the Real Mt. Sinai" (1998)

Noah's Ark - Durupinar site.
In the news this year, although in some media they downplay the fact that Ron Wyatt was the chief researcher for decades. A gentleman named Andrew Jones has done wonderful work and study the last years, giving proper credit to Ron Wyatt.

Note that these were ridiculed for many years, but was Ron Wyatt lying?

Also, listen to his sons, tell me, are they lying about their experiences?

In the worst case scenario, Ron should be honoured as the top Biblical archaeologist of the 20th century for his work on the two sites above.

And then make sure you smell a sulfur ball from the Sodom & Gomorrah site using a match flame.

Then we can discuss the Ark of the Covenant.