View Single Post
  #76  
Old 01-12-2026, 10:26 AM
donfriesen1 donfriesen1 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 676
Re: Discrepancy in Church Practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa View Post
Not some, just you. I called you and you alone an ecclesiastical narcissist.

The term is employed to describe those who always want everyone to shut up and listen to them. No discussion is involved. They might claim that they would change their view if shown scripturally their error. But, that is usually a form of baiting individuals into gladiator school. Their minds are thoroughly made up. As is yours. Which by the way is perfectly fine. Believe as you want to believe,the only thing is, is that people are here on the forum (all three of us) not to be your echo chamber.

Actually I wasn't talking about myself. I was under the impression you were restarting a closed by the admin thread. the bear would be the admin. Not me. You poke me and others constantly in your your posts. Like answering Votivesoul in the I AM=father thread, by calling out to me in your answer to him? Own your own behavior.

Human nature? Don, do you believe people can get the Holy Ghost? That the Spirit of God can dwell in them and lead them? Don't you believe that through repentance, and receiving of the Holy Ghost you will get a changed nature? 2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.
1 Corinthians 2:10-13 which states that we have received the Spirit of God, which reveals the things of God to us. Therefore it is God who brings you from the old creation to the new creation. You put off the old man, and put on the new man, Ephesians 4:22-24. Paul addressing the Roman Apostolic Church would've taken a changed nature into consideration. We don't have to make people do things. If the have the Holy Ghost they will have holiness. Paul wasn't a babysitter, or a despot. Romans 14 took into consideration the weakness of the faith of the neophytes, and therefore knew that the Holy Ghost in them would be the author and finisher of their faith Hebrews 12:2.

Don, right here we can see you don't understand the scripture. Weak in faith is just that, weakness in belief and trust in God alone. Not in human discipline! We in the Kingdom of Jesus Christ are to help the weak brethren to seek after the Holy Ghost. Through prayer and supplication, reading the scripture as led by the Holy Ghost. We aren't to train them as we would an apprentice on a job. Jesus Christ is the Head of the Body. Not me, not you. I'm not the author and finisher of anyone's faith. I'm just a brother who can only be available if needed. This isn't about some sort of human discipline of memorizing rules and regulations on meat or tofu.

Don, the weakness Paul is describing is told to us! It is weak in faith, which is weak in belief. In Romans 15:1 Paul tells the mature elders that they are to support the "failings" of the neophytes. In verse 2 Paul says to support the near brother and build them up. Encourage them in the Holy Ghost. Paul isn't looking to encourage Holy Vegetarianism!

Paul understands that everyone who is sincere will allow the Holy Ghost to work through them and in them. They will no longer speak like children, or act like children. That when they become full mature adults they will put childish understanding away. They no longer will use the gifts partially, but walk in them fully. As mature elders of the Body.

I never posted what you are saying above. Because I don't believe or teach as you are saying above. Anyone reading my words who actually know me, would say you are misrepresenting me. Because they know me. What's sad is that you throw your rebuke at me, then you quote 2 Timothy 4:2 None of what is said in 2 Timothy 4:2 is to be done with carnal human discipline in mind. It is to be applied to the sincere saint of God who has the Holy Ghost, and is being led by the Holy Ghost. Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. These words in a nutshell are exactly what Paul is saying in Romans. The main word Timothy is to focus on is longsuffering. Which is being patient with those he is convincing, rebuking, exhorting, and teaching. The Holy Ghost is the main power to make anything in that list even work. If the strong brother, and weak brother don't allow the Holy Ghost to work charity through them. Then absolutely zero will happen. Listen, you may shut someone up after you beat them up in the church office. They may go out and be sitting down physically, but in their heart they're standing up. If the Holy Ghost doesn't push the buttons and blow the whistles, you will have nothing but an ecclesiastical side show.

Paul is telling Timothy the evangelist to deal with individuals who are elders. They aren't weak brethren as in new converts. Those who Timothy was to deal with aren't labeled as weak in the faith. Don, you are all over the place.

Don, you are not understanding what is happening in Romans 14. Paul is dealing with new converts and elders. New converts need their faith strengthened so they aren't worried about where the meat is coming from. Or if they are breaking the sabbath if they help someone get their oxen out of a ditch. Paul isn't dealing with with elders desiring to be teachers of the Law.
In Romans he is dealing with the same thing he dealt with over in Corinth. Weak brethren Romans 14, and 1 Corinthians 8:10. Elders needed to watch what they were doing in order not to not cause a young new convert to stumble.

Paul wouldn't of ever advocated to Timothy to have weak faith elders to teach anything, let alone the Law of Moses. Don do you think your a weaker brother because you hold a third view from Pastor Doe, and the Organization?
Para 1.
Quote:
Not some, just you. I called you and you alone an ecclesiastical narcissist.
This post of Dom's is about points Dom makes about Ro14, and about what Dom thinks about me. I'll not take time to reply to his dislike for me.

Quote:
Actually I wasn't talking about myself. I was under the impression you were restarting a closed by the admin thread. the bear would be the admin. Not me. You poke me and others constantly in your your posts.
Dom says "I was under the impression". Speedy reading of a post can cause this, creating wrong impressions.

Questions raised in para 3 are not relevant to this thread. They may only have been said by Dom to cast doubt that I am an Apostolic.

Para 4 does not directly respond to what I say about Ro14.

I agree that Paul speaks in Ro14 to those who are weak. Para 5.

Para 6. Dom says
Quote:
I never posted what you are saying above. Anyone reading my words who actually know me, would say you are misrepresenting me.
True, I never said so in so many words. But those who believe that Paul believes that God always speaks with perfect clarity for every doctrine must be concluded to think that Paul condones false doctrine. When telling those saints in Rome who believe 'contrary things', that they are all OK to do so, then would see some with false doctrine, if God is always perfectly clear. When you teach that Ro14 is only about weak/strong saints, it does not address the fact that Paul says those holding opposing opinions are OK to do so. It gives the impression he condones false doctrine. You do not address this part of my coclusions in your beliefs. Because you don't, others are left believing otherwise.

Dom says this will only work for... and then he gives a reason. The reason he gives is good but it does not address the issue of Paul allowing saints all to hold opposing views of the same doctrine. Thus, you again skirt the main point of the thread. Why do you not address the main point in your comments, Dom?

Para 7. What Dom says does not address the main point of the thread.

Para 8. Dom again does not talk about the main point of this thread. If he keeps talking about another thing, does he do it purposely, to purposely avoid talking about that which he can't, as a diversionary tactic? Maybe. But am I the only one to think so?

Dom here says I don't understand that the Ro14 talk is about weak/strong saints. I've said that I agree with this point, so I must actually be understanding, right, Dom?

What I don't understand is why Dom won't talk about the main point of the thread. Surely an Evangelist should be able to see that God often reveals truth when those who read his Word read between the lines to discover it, right?

Limiting God, by saying Ro14 is only about weak/strong saints, does not show him with the abilities which reading between the lines does. God is greater than you make him out to be, Dom. Don't limit the limitless God.
Reply With Quote