[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

.

Don, none of your points are valid. The only valid point you have is right on top of your head.

Okaaay....then. That's a rather pointed comment, don't you think, reader? Someone does not want to have meaningful Bible discussion today, wanting to sling mud instead.

One point I made - that there are no OT commands for head covering doctrine - cannot be denied. No one ever quotes a reference to any such OT verse, because they can't. Thus it is a valid point.

Why this is significant: Paul indicates the base for his God's Order of Authority doctrine is found in the Beginning. 1Co11.7-10. If the base is there, then the symbol should be too, when it is realized that all humans of all time (incl A&E) would need to show regard to God's Order of Authority - using a symbol. If the base is in the Beginning, Ge2, then it would be expected that the symbol would also be indicated. But God has not OT indicated by command either His Order of Authority or the symbol. As shown in my 1Co11 commentary, there is a reason for this.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing

Some then would even deny the reality of valid Biblical points, especially when this reality contradicts their head-covering views!

Dom should try making up a Bible verse and pass it off for a real one. This would be similar to denying Biblical reality. Who would want someone who denies Bible reality teaching them doctrine?

There are times when someone will want someone else to disappear from off the face of the earth. They will use extreme measures, like denying reality, to indicate this. But why? It is so easy to accept truth.