View Single Post
  #20  
Old 06-25-2008, 11:49 AM
chaotic_resolve chaotic_resolve is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,243
Re: Pre-Election Plans to Attack Iran

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
So my friend, what do you think the proper course of action should be to deal with Iran getting nuclear bombs? Considering that they have an official position of wiping Israel off the face of the earth... and have a proven track record of equiping terrorists that want to blow up America....

IF (and Godforbid) Barak Obama is elected, and IF (yea right) he were to support action against Iran, I would stand up and cheer and support him 100% for the act.
Ahmadinejad is just a puppet ... according to Iran's laws he has a boss. The real leader in Iran (and commander in chief of the military) is not Ahmadinejad - it's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And while Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is completely against Israel and the US, it's doubtful he would seek to acquire, or use nuclear weapons against Israel.

It's already a done deal anyway. We and the EU are doing exactly what the US and England did to Japan before the attack on Pearl Harbor. We and other nations are now going to blockade Iran's ports and squeeze them to the point where Iran will have no choice but to attack. Then we'll say, "see, I told you so."

Just a matter of time.

Let negotiations continue. Forget about the puppet and appeal to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the real power of Iran - the people. Blockades and sanctions are only going to hurt the people of Iran, not Ahmadinejad. Negotiating with Iran isn't a sign of weakness, so long as there is no appeasement.

Remember: Negotiation does NOT equal Appeasement.
Reply With Quote