I thought this was interesting:
Luke (Acts) vs Paul (Epistles)
Arguments for a “second blessing” tend to centre on the book of Acts. It seems that everyone who was baptised in or received the Spirit certainly knew about it. Many spoke in tongues or prophesied. It often occurred close to the time of conversion but apparently not always (e.g. the Samaritans in
Acts 8, and of course the disciples themselves).
Acts 19:2 is crucial in the argument. Paul’s question “did you receive the Spirit when you believed?”
is addressed to some “disciples” from Ephesus and seems to imply that first you can believe without receiving, and second that you would know if you had received.