View Single Post
  #2  
Old 02-03-2009, 07:35 PM
Pastor Keith's Avatar
Pastor Keith Pastor Keith is offline
Follower of Jesus


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,275
Re: Segraves and OPs re-examine dispensationalism?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
2008 UGST Symposium

Oneness Pentecostals and Dispensationalism: Modification or Replacement?
Daniel L. Segraves, PhD (ABD)

Although the early twentieth century Pentecostal movement did not originally
embrace dispensationalism,2 the dispensational theory soon flourished in some segments
of Pentecostalism among those who “shared the premillennial vision of the future” and
who thus found that “dispensationalism with its intense emphasis on futuristic
eschatology had a strong appeal to them.”3 It was immediately necessary, however, for
Pentecostals to modify Scofieldian dispensationalism, because although the “system . . .
provides a convenient method of organizing biblical history and teaches that it is possible
to fit the full range of prophetic Scripture into something like a complicated puzzle,”4 it
also asserted “that the gifts of the Spirit, especially what has been called ‘the sensational
gifts’ or ‘sign gifts’ (healing, faith, working of miracles, and tongues), were confined to
the apostolic age.”5 Although cessationism was rejected by Pentecostals, “the
dispensational understanding of the church, as well as its eschatology, has influenced
pentecostal theology.”6

MORE HERE: http://www.ugst.org/uploaded/Symposium/2008/Papers/OnenessPentecostalsAndDispensationalism_Segraves.p df

This is refreshing to hear, because some of the implications of the usages of dispensationalism that I learned led to many of the things that Segraves discusses. Actually he taught me many of those things. Glad to hear that there is some new thought going into this.
__________________
Please pray for India

My personal mission is to BRING people into a right relationship with God, GROW them up to maturity and SEND them back into the world to minister.
Reply With Quote