Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
Barb, loved your post! You should get on the soapbox more often!
The thing is is that Dan calls threestepper's heretics. He has taken on the mantle of those who are divisive amongst the threestepper crowd and now uses it to support the onestepper doctrine in the same divisive manner.
It's really sad we couldn't stay in the same fellowship (UPC) and fellowship the difference because the end result is the same.
|
I called your doctrine of repentance + baptism as heretical, Mizpeh. Of which you have labeled yourself as a heretic. Don't play martyr ... woman up and grab a Kleenex.
Now .... it does seem that your agenda is to paint with the brush of false witness making this thread about Dan ...
The mantel of the 1990's 3 stepper crowd is one of disfellowship, Mizpeh and it's still around today ... see WPF.
The difference is I can think your baptismal regenerationist view that you support with "pagan" Catholic thinkers that you dogmatically refute on their views of the Godhead ... but parade to support BR doctrine ... is PATENTLY false ... but I consider you a sister in Christ and will fellowship you...
Nor,
like you, do I dismiss those in the blood bought Body of Christ ... as going to hell ... "let God be their judge" (the catchphrase) .... because they haven't followed your equational formula or experienced tongues ...
Your doctrine by definition disfellowships most of the Body ...
add standards and that pretty much ... makes
you, Mizzy, a backslidden Apostolic sympathizer.
Deal w/ the facts.
Not aspersions ....
Signed ...
NOT THE WOLF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING ...