Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
He had nothing to hide and was acting secretive, IMO. There was no need, was there?
My question again - What answer could he possibly have given that would have incriminated him? He said he was afraid of that, so what would have incriminated him? I don't get that part.
I'll check back later.
|
He was not acting secretive.
He was asserting his rights and freedoms as assured him by the Constitution of The United States.
Had their answer been yes... he would have answered.
The DID NOT answer yes because they had no legal standing to force him to answer those questions.
He knew they didn't.
He stood up to the challenge.
He won.
They had no right.
He knew they had no right.
He called their bluff.
He was set free.
That isn't being secretive. That is making sure your personal rights are recognized.
I say 3 cheers....