Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
I'll launch into a hot button issue...
I believe that water baptism is absolutely essential for Christian salvation. However, I'm partial to pouring as a mode of baptism. I'm not wanting to debate this here but I'll give you a link to a site that addresses some of the reasons why I believe this ( http://www.reformedonline.com/view/r...%20Baptism.htm). While I don't entirely agree with this person on every point, I believe he adequately explains why effusion is at the very least an equally valid mode of baptism.
Now to the main point of this post...
I don't believe in the "Jesus Name" formula.
That's right, I don't believe in the "Jesus Name" formula. However, I also don't believe in the Trinitarian formula. In fact, I don't believe that one can biblically establish a baptismal "formula" from Scripture. In addition, I believe that to establish a set "formula" is to sacramentalize baptism and negate baptism's true biblical blessing. In Apostolic churches throughout the world a formula such as,
"According to the profession of your faith, I hereby baptize you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins." ..., or some such formula. I believe that this isn't biblical.
I believe that it is the convert who is to call on the name of Jesus Christ at their water baptism, not a religious official. That negates baptism even having a said "formula".
I just thought I'd drop that one your way here guys. |
Good article. Moot point to me, but good article.
And, actually, no..... Christ did not command us to be baptized. He commanded his disciples to disciple and to baptize .......
Those who believed the Gospel were to be baptized as part of the discipling process. Had nothing to do with salvation before God, only with being accepted as saved before the Church.