View Single Post
  #19  
Old 02-27-2010, 01:34 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,396
Re: *** 8.8 Earthquake rocks Chile ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by TroubleMaker View Post
You've forgotten? Here they are for you in numerical order so that it's simplified for you.

1) So in what way were the apostles correct?
2) One might surmise that the apostles either didn't understand what "last days" meant, or that they we don't know what last days means. In fact, it would seem one of those statements would certainly have to be true. Do you agree and if so, who didn't understand...you or the apostles?

3) You asked if God has told me when the "Coming" will be. Do you think it's possible that God may have told me when the "Coming" will be, and if not, why did you ask?
4) Yes, Matthew, Mark, and Luke recorded that Jesus said there would be earthquakes in "divers places". Was Jesus truly giving a sign?
5) History records "earthquakes in divers places" since the time he said it, and even before. So do you have any theories on what Jesus truly meant?

6) Was he making a rhetorical statement such as, "When rivers have water, we will be in the last days" as a way of saying we could never know?

7) No, both statements are NOT correct, otherwise you would have posted both. But you chose to post only one statement, which was, "These are the last days." You said nothing about, "Folks are hurting and we should help."
So because I did not post that exact statement you automatically assumed I did not care?

1. The Apostles are correct period, it is us that get it mixed up (just look around at the world of Christianity for proof of that.)
2. You are surmising the Apostles didn't understand since you brought that up.
3. That was a rhetorical question as you seem to find fault with the statement, "in the last days there will be earthquakes in divers places.
4. Again, are you calling into question Jesus statement in the Gospels?
I take it for what it says.
5. See the answer above for question 4.
6. Was he? I take it at face value, that Jesus meant what he said.
7. See my first statement.
Reply With Quote