|
Re: Do Branhamites?...
Quote:
Originally Posted by EyeamOK
Ms.Brattified ignores Genesis 4:2 Adam knew his wife once. Two sons born.
I wonder which doctrine appears to make more sense? |
Not yours. Using your [faulty] logic, ABEL would have been the son of the serpent, because scripture plainly says that ADAM knew his wife and she bare Cain. 
Gen 4:20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.
Gen 4:21 And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.
Gen 4:22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.
Notice that scripture doesn't specify each time a woman bore a child that she "knew" her husband. I don't think that means there was another man (or in this case, creature) involved.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
|