Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
What is still a mystery to me .... is how restorationism differs from "light doctrine" ... as men like JR Ensey have rejected "light doctrine" but has apparently embraced restorationist theology in some ways ...
Both believe that the Church gradually embraced increasing light of revelation through the centuries as Truth was restored .... with the exception that men like Ensey believe those not in full Truth as he sees it .... ultimately perish ....
While the pioneering leadership like AD Urshan, Frank Ewart, Clyde Haney, GT Haywood, Dave Gray, SG Norris, WT Witherspoon, et al .... do not but rather saved, or granted eternal life, in the light they were given.
Of course, DB and Shaw never tip their hand if they think the rest of Christianity .... historically is LOST.
Conveniently, glossed over. And say and apologize what you want DB .... that's cultic in the definition of many
|
SG Norris taught that there were 3 categories. My mom grew up in the ABI church and most of my family went to ABI... i was the odd duck since I went to IBC.
SGN taught there were holy, righteous and wicked.
holy were full 3 step + holy lifestyle till death/resurrection they go to heaven/new jerusalem
righteous were those who walked in their righteousness they knew towards God... they go to the new earth
the wicked burn
it was a advanced teaching he gave to abi students and folks from his church, usually with some kind of Larkin chart since the man loved Clarence Larkins Dispensational Truth and his book on Daniel