It has to mean something for the Jewish believers to notice that the Gentiles were filled the SAME WAY they were, and tongues were noted. NOTHING ELSE says one way or another about initial evidence. Initial evidence was an issue.
Sorry, brethren. I stick to the idea, myself.
I went around in bouts with good brethren here who claim one receives the Spirit into one's life before Spirit Baptism, and we showed that it cannot be proved that
Acts 2 had people get both dual experiences of what they call the Spirit entrance and Spirit baptism. We discussed the issue of the various terms applied to the experience in
Acts 2. Infilling, outpouring, baptism, etc. And as much as onesteppers claim there steppers cannot conclusively prove their point, neither can onesteppers.