Look out Aquila, they are watching you.

[NotforSale]

Originally Posted by scotty

Ok, if we are talking about cars parked on the street in front of your home then sure. But other than a noise issue, what would it matter if your neighbor had 100 people over twice a week ?

City ordinances are meant to keep a neighborhood a neighborhood. If you want to run a business, then find a location that can support the demand of people and parking.

If they make an exception for this man and his church, they will have to allow other homes to do the same thing. The problem is, when you allow a commercial exposure in a residential area, the liability affects everyone.

I'm an insurance agent and I specialize in commercial insurance. I also do personal lines as well (Auto/Home/Life), and crossing certain lines in these areas changes the entire dynamics of how to rate fairly.

If this man’s house burns down because of a fire caused by one of his services, his personal lines policy will most likely refuse coverage. If this fire then catches the neighbor’s house on fire, now you’ve got some serious issues that will probably wind up in a huge court battle.

[scotty]

Originally Posted by Dagwood

Part of what I was looking for: (from the comments on the article...)


1) The house is on a cul d sac with 7 other houses and open fields on one side of that cul d sac. Hardly a crowed neighborhood. Go Google Earth and search Branding Iron Road, San Juan Capistrano, California.
2) The homes are all large the Fromms is almost 5,000 sq ft. Unless each person attending their meeting drives their own car there wouldn’t be very many cars on the street has no homes on one side.
3) The law, as several have researched, only applies if you have more than 50 people – An over zealous or anti-christian action appears evident in that stretch. That or one of the other home owners is connected to someone on the city council or government and is forcing this situation.

Good research .