Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Twisp

You got one part of your post right, lol.

I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring in a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Maybe some of these liberals will apologize for their "humorous" statements:

“But I’ve often said that if I had — I have two dogs — if I had two retarded children, I’d be a hero. And yet the dogs, which are pretty much the same thing. What? They’re sweet. They’re loving. They’re kind, but they don’t mentally advance at all. … Dogs are like retarded children.” — Bill Maher

"I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health" -- New York city councilman Charles Barron

“Did you hear this – Sarah Palin finally heard what happened in Japan and she’s demanding that we invade ‘Tsunami.’I mean she said, ‘These ‘Tsunamians’ will not get away with this.’ Oh speaking of dumb twats, did you…” --Bill Maher

“Again, (America is) a stupid country with stupid people who don’t pay attention.” — Bill Maher

"Drudge? Aw, Drudge, somebody ought to wrap a strong Republican entrail around his neck and hoist him up about six feet in the air and watch him bounce." -- Liberal radio host, Mike Malloy

Have you notice that the crazies congregate on the left???? Therefore, when their crazies say nutty things they all stand, laugh, and cheer, like they are so deep and insightful. Ridiculous! And Maher is the craziest of all!!

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by crakjak

I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring in a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

You must have seen different testimony than I did. I don't recall her ever wanting the public to pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility. Exactly when did she ask that?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by crakjak

I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring

in

a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

POTD!!!!!!

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Twisp

You got one part of your post right, lol.

I am not a fan of Rush's, though I agree generally with his conservative positions.

But for the Democrats to bring in a stupid young law student to demand that the public pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility, I say someone in the culture should be able to stand up and say that she is stupid and wrong. This is a lawless culture without constraint, and it is a very bad message to the nation and the world!!!

This is NOTHING but a political ploy by the Demos to draw the conservatives into a battle over a subject that will bring out the bitter women in the culture screaming and hollering about being abused and that their "health" is being put at risk!!! Trying to change the subject from the abject failure of our neophyte president that has not a clue, except to use Chicago tactics to stay in power. He will stop at nothing to be re-elected is my attitude toward him.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Twisp

You must have seen different testimony than I did. I don't recall her ever wanting the public to pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility. Exactly when did she ask that?

Newt seems to be the only Republican candidate that is speaking to this story for what it is. We are allowing the media to frame the argument on a women's rights issue when it is about religious liberty.

More have admonished Limbaugh’s description of Sandra Fluke than admonished a 30 year-old woman embarrassing herself before congress by testifying that she simply cannot stop getting it on and her inability to control her urges constitutes infringing upon everyone else for a bailout. CNS News did the math:

But, back to this woman’s complaint that women are spending $3,000 for birth control during her time in college.

“For a lot of students, like me, who are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary,” she complains.

So, they can earn enough money in just one summer to pay for three full years of sex. And, yes, they are full years – since that could translate into having sex nearly three times a day for three years straight, apparently.

At a dollar a condom if she shops at CVS pharmacy’s website, that $3,000 would buy her 3,000 condoms – or, 1,000 a year. (By the way, why does CVS.com list the weight of its condom products in terms of pounds?)

Assuming it’s not a leap year, that’s 1,000 divided by 365 – or having sex 2.74 times a day, every day, for three straight years. And, I thought Georgetown was a Catholic university where women might be prone to shun casual, unmarried sex. At least its health insurance doesn’t cover contraception (that which you subsidize, you get more of, you know).

Emily at NakedDC, who went to law school, calls BS on Fluke’s calculations:

… the idea that they are paying $1000 per year for birth control is a little crazy. Condoms at CVS cost $1, so that means, if you take this cheaper option, you are actually having sex three times a day, which is kind of insane and you’re going to have a lot more medical expenses than just birth control. Like chafing. Also, you need psychological help. If its birth control pills they’re using, well,Planned Parenthood, which has plenty of offices within driving distance of the DC area, seems to think those only cost $15 – $50 per month, which is half Ms. Fluke’s estimate. A fitted diaphragm costs about $60 and can be used all year long, including special occasions. And IUDs and the Depo-Provera shot are half the estimate cost (at about $500 each).

I’ve not heard a single Republican politician stand up to the media narrative on this. Instead of projecting surrogate modesty towards Fluke, they project it towards Limbaugh, who is calling the truth for what it is.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...ctured%20Story

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Newt seems to be the only Republican candidate that is speaking to this story for what it is. We are allowing the media to frame the argument on a women's rights issue when it is about religious liberty.




http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...ctured%20Story

Very true!!

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Newt seems to be the only Republican candidate that is speaking to this story for what it is. We are allowing the media to frame the argument on a women's rights issue when it is about religious liberty.




http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...ctured%20Story

I'll ask you the same I have asked all of her detractors. Where did she ever say she needed birth control for "getting it on"? Everyone keeps saying that, but no one can provide a statement from her that confirms that.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Twisp

You must have seen different testimony than I did. I don't recall her ever wanting the public to pay for her ability to have sex without any responsibility. Exactly when did she ask that?

She is at Georgetown on a "public interest" scholarship! So, she wants to be protected from having children while in law school, by having the public pay for her birth control pills!!!

Because it is in the "public interest" for her not to have kids, that the public would then have to pay for the cost of her natal care, and day care for her children, and of course, room and board for them as well.

So, you see she wants the public to take responsibility for her decisions. Like she is an animal and can't control herself and must have sex!!

Oh, but the left will say that for a law student, "...birth control pills are for her health, control periods, and estrogen and etc, etc!!! What a messed up entitlement leftists mindset!!!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Twisp

I'll ask you the same I have asked all of her detractors. Where did she ever say she needed birth control for "getting it on"? Everyone keeps saying that, but no one can provide a statement from her that confirms that.

Fluke's complaint is that women are spending $3,000 for birth control during their time in college.

“For a lot of students, like me, who are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary,” she complains.

That expense calculates to 2.74 times per day she says she and her fellow students are having sex. Enrollment is going to skyrocket, I imagine.

"If she is, kudos! But promiscuity is not the hallmark of a virtuous woman. Is it Limbaugh’s fault for pointing it out or Fluke’s fault for the behavior? It’s a rhetorical question and the answer proved Limbaugh’s entire point." - Dana Loesch