Parenting: Money for good grades??

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Jay

I agree with you entirely (missed the whole bra burning stunts by being born twenty years afterward).


I believe that the militant feminist movement is the reason that so many of our young men are gay. There have always been those who were homosexual, however they were far fewer than they are today. This rise also appears to correspond with the rise of militant feminists who claimed that men were the problem for everything that has ever occured. In fact, the militant feminist movement is very active in pushing the pro-homosexual agenda.

I have to agree.

[AreYouReady?]

Originally Posted by Jay

I agree with you entirely (missed the whole bra burning stunts by being born twenty years afterward).

Be glad. You did not miss anything of real importance.

Originally Posted by Jay

I believe that the militant feminist movement is the reason that so many of our young men are gay. There have always been those who were homosexual, however they were far fewer than they are today.

Perhaps.

I would also say that the chemicals in our food and especially in the plastic containers likewise play a role in it. It is said that the chemical in plastic containers called Bisphenol A has synthetic estrogen properties in it which can accumulate in a male's blood stream and tissues. While this cannot be blamed for people being gay in the past, it may be one causative for the increase in the present. It's considered to be just a theory at the moment...why would any male want to willingly be a subject for testing this theory?

There is also the theory that given the explosion of breast cancer in women, that this might be counted as a cause?

http://www.thedailygreen.com/environ...nol-a-47091707

Originally Posted by Jay

This rise also appears to correspond with the rise of militant feminists who claimed that men were the problem for everything that has ever occured. In fact, the militant feminist movement is very active in pushing the pro-homosexual agenda.

Yeah. I don't ascribe to that mentality that those women have. The problems facing the genders are a result of both genders going against God's will and powerful outside forces propagating the problems for the sake of social engineering to what they want society to be.

Speaking from a woman's point of view, I do believe though, that women should be self-sufficient because there are many variables that can happen in one's lifetime. We cannot always count on someone human to be there for us.

[Jay]

Originally Posted by AreYouReady?

Be glad. You did not miss anything of real importance.




Perhaps.

I would also say that the chemicals in our food and especially in the plastic containers likewise play a role in it. It is said that the chemical in plastic containers called Bisphenol A has synthetic estrogen properties in it which can accumulate in a male's blood stream and tissues. While this cannot be blamed for people being gay in the past, it may be one causative for the increase in the present. It's considered to be just a theory at the moment...why would any male want to willingly be a subject for testing this theory?

There is also the theory that given the explosion of breast cancer in women, that this might be counted as a cause?

http://www.thedailygreen.com/environ...nol-a-47091707






Yeah. I don't ascribe to that mentality that those women have. The problems facing the genders are a result of both genders going against God's will and powerful outside forces propagating the problems for the sake of social engineering to what they want society to be.

Speaking from a woman's point of view, I do believe though, that women should be self-sufficient because there are many variables that can happen in one's lifetime. We cannot always count on someone human to be there for us.

I am not going to disagree with anything that you have posted. I believe that there are many factors, and that millitant feminism is only one of them, although doubtless a major one.

On the issue of women being able to support themselves, there is no disagreement. I would say that there are certain positions that a woman should not hold, but they are actually rather few in comparison to what was available years ago. Having said this, I have found through my study of history that it is late 20th century myth (perpetuated by the feminist movement) that women have been bound to their homes, husbands, and children with no opportunities to improve herself or her situation. Though recorded history, there are women owning businesses, workiing out side of the home, farming, ranching, preaching, to name only a very few things.

[AreYouReady?]

Originally Posted by Jay

Having said this, I have found through my study of history that it is late 20th century myth (perpetuated by the feminist movement) that women have been bound to their homes, husbands, and children with no opportunities to improve herself or her situation. Though recorded history, there are women owning businesses, workiing out side of the home, farming, ranching, preaching, to name only a very few things.

I can agree with this. Even Proverbs 31 talks about the virtuous woman.

I wonder how the myth that women were stuck at home got started? Never mind...I know. I lived during those years when hollywood made movies, commercials on television, and pop songs sang about women being able to be superwomen.

Reality is...they did not tell us that while we can have a career, home, children, pay taxes, the latest fashions, have wall-to-wall carpet and two late model cars in the double garage...that some quality of life will suffer in exchange for all that. Most of us had to learn that the hard way, by experience.

Those who are the movers and shakers of social engineering don't care because they are the ones who gain monetarily and the homes and children are the ones to suffer for the movers and shakers of social engineering's monetary gain.

[Jay]

Originally Posted by AreYouReady?

I can agree with this. Even Proverbs 31 talks about the virtuous woman.

I wonder how the myth that women were stuck at home got started? Never mind...I know. I lived during those years when hollywood made movies, commercials on television, and pop songs sang about women being able to be superwomen.

Reality is...they did not tell us that while we can have a career, home, children, pay taxes, the latest fashions, have wall-to-wall carpet and two late model cars in the double garage...that some quality of life will suffer in exchange for all that. Most of us had to learn that the hard way, by experience.

Those who are the movers and shakers of social engineering don't care because they are the ones who gain monetarily and the homes and children are the ones to suffer for the movers and shakers of social engineering's monetary gain.

I believe that even the radical feminist Gloria Steinem settled down for a number of years with a husband, and yet claimed that other women who would do so were being enslaved. Funny, they want one thing for themselves, but something else for the rest of us. It is really a sad and pathetic world that we live in.

When I was growing up, I would occasionally be glared at if I held the door open for a woman. I understood even as a young teenager what was really going on (I still hold the door open for ladies, most seem to appreciate it now).

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Jay

I believe that even the radical feminist Gloria Steinem settled down for a number of years with a husband, and yet claimed that other women who would do so were being enslaved. Funny, they want one thing for themselves, but something else for the rest of us. It is really a sad and pathetic world that we live in.
When I was growing up, I would occasionally be glared at if I held the door open for a woman. I understood even as a young teenager what was really going on (I still hold the door open for ladies, most seem to appreciate it now).

Steinem had in the past been critical of the institution of marriage, stating that "marriage was the model for slavery law in this country".[6] She explained her change in attitude toward marriage, saying 'I didn't change. Marriage changed. We spent 30 years in the United States changing the marriage laws. If I had married when I was supposed to get married, I would have lost my name, my legal residence, my credit rating, many of my civil rights. That's not true anymore. It's possible to make an equal marriage'.[7]

[Jay]

She has no clue as to what she is talking about. Ask Fanny J. Crosby about all of that.

[berkeley]

what?