A Picture of Jesus

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Thanks.

BTW, I have no idea what you're talking about, in Ish and Geber. New to me. According to biblegateway.com, Ish doesn't appear in the KJV, and Geber appears twice, without much info about him. Guess you have to discern between the lines.

these are the original terms, that have dropped out of use in KJV
and later versions, and are translated "man" now.

I'm still searching here myself, and possibly the diff
in "Adam" and "eth ha Adam" is more to the point,
that being that there is doubt at A&E only.

[acerrak]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

these are the original terms, that have dropped out of use in KJV
and later versions, and are translated "man" now.

I'm still searching here myself, and possibly the diff
in "Adam" and "eth ha Adam" is more to the point,
that being that there is doubt at A&E only.

not really a difference, chapter 2 goes into detail of what God did chapter one.

In the begining God created, and God created man in His own image. chapter 2 adam is "this same man"

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by acerrak

not really a difference, chapter 2 goes into detail of what God did chapter one.

In the begining God created, and God created man in His own image. chapter 2 adam is "this same man"

Ya I haven't really grasped yet the diff
in Adam and eth ha Adam, and where Ish
comes in; I just note that some scholars
see an 8th day creation, some see
serpent seed...I'm pretty sure we all
come from Adam spiritually.

[bbyrd009]

This, and Branhamism, I think might be
best considered hidden, when
"nothing essential is hidden."

Meaning that it is surely irrelevant,
not that there might not be truth in it.