Crazy Stuff from Reckart followers and their leade

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Yea some of his stuff is better than most you read on the net. I do not like his railing on Hebrew names.

He rails on a lot of stuff, lol.

[houston]

Originally Posted by Esaias

I like reading Cohen's articles.

I might not agree with everything he says, but he is certainly more interesting than a lot of the milquetoast pablum that passes for 'religious literature' being put out there these days.

jmo.

He does have a lot of great articles.

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

check this Facebook topic. It's a picture with comments

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f..._t=photo_reply

quotes

This is proof about yhwh how evil it is

We get that name From the jews but here is what they use it for God went by Jesus in the ot

Y H W H....... is evil, and will lead to....... H E L L.

Halellujah is not in the bible, Alleluia is, a Latin word in Revelation, which even Vine's won't touch because it's not a word...

Jesus' name is not Jeshua, Yeshua, Jehashua (or any of the many, many guess names people come up with)...it's Jesus. In Hebrew it's Jesha(s), and this is pronounced "Je-shahs". Now, look up Strongs H3468 and what does this name mean? Jesus came in the flesh, not the Tetragammaton or any of the 72+ guess names which have come from it. Either for some reason you have me blocked or you just can't answer simple questions straight from Scritpure...either way I have disproved your Tetragrammaton points enough, I'm done here.

Reckart: Anointed, all this copy, cut, paste of generational lies is just that. All Jevon is doing is parroting the lies of the Jews, monks, Catholics, Protestants, law-keeping Hebrew roots sacred namers. YHWH is not the name of God, and never was. It was put into the Bible by Babylonian Jews. YHWH is a devil name. Any guess names derived from it are devil names

Reckart: Double sex god of the Kabbalah which is claimed by Jews to be the secret meaning behind the Torah and the Talmud. It is the Jews who say the

Does anyone even take this nut serious?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Does anyone even take this nut serious?

Originally Posted by houston

He does have a lot of great articles.

Houston?

[Michael The Disciple]

Its kind of funny in a way. Not long ago both on this forum and on the GNC the Hebrew YHWH was being ridiculed. Im glad to see some here are understanding that when you see this (LORD) in the OT that is just an English representation for YHWH.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Its kind of funny in a way. Not long ago both on this forum and on the GNC the Hebrew YHWH was being ridiculed. Im glad to see some here are understanding that when you see this (LORD) in the OT that is just an English representation for YHWH.

Reckart and his followers believe Jews ADDED the letters to the Hebrew scriptures!

He teaches the name there originally was Jesus

It's interesting they quote certain sources yet deride the quoting of sources that show they are wrong

More interesting is when I go and check the resource I find not only are their claims of what that resource said untrue, other times it was only part of what the resource said and the rest refutes them.

I wish Reckarts followers would go read these same resources for themselves. Read the Encyclopedia Britannica and see if it says what they claim

This also explains why several quotes get deleted from their discussions from those that are refuting them

[houston]

Esaias,

His name is not Cohen. LOL

[houston]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Houston?

You're sayin' it wrong. It's "how-stin."

[houston]

Originally Posted by houston

He does have a lot of great articles.

About this...

I stumbled onto his site in the late 90's. He had great articles on post trib, Daniel's 70 weeks, and Israel of God.

[Praxeas]

And I hear people enamored with this guys articles but the fact is he makes a lot of assertions but never backs them up and the ones he does back up the resources don't really say what they claim

Other issues are just pure logical fallacies

For example the quote the Kaballah saying God is a male/female God..well actually they don't quote it, they just say it says so. But rather than say it teaches God is dual gendered, Reckart says bi-sexual.

This is his argument for YHWH being a demon and that the Jews invented it. But the Kaballah cited is probably a middle age invention

Just because some book perverts the image of God does not mean YHWH was a Jewish invention inserted into scriptures. It just means some one later on wrote crazy stuff ABOUT YHWH

Lastly the Kaballah is a book of Jewish mysticism. It's not a Jewish commentary

Another common tactic is to quote editions of Encyclopedias that are 50 years old...good luck finding one to see if what he says is true. How convenient

Another is claiming an older version of a commentary supports him but was since edited...good luck finding that older version.

Yet that quote says nothing about his claims. What he does is quotes a snippet then without you realizing it, he end quotes then elaborates in his own words.