Commanded to Speak in Tongues?

[houston]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I wrote a song to you, diablo?

Vas a ver...

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Lacking that in the text, it is you who have added this, onto the end of a beautiful Scripture that is not revealing tongues. Anyone who seeks may find here, and may the Spirit be your guide. Dissect the relevant verses on a Bible engine; you could spend 4 hours on a verse now. Or, witness the fruit

There is more evidence in the Book of Acts supporting tongues than against it.

The fruit of the spirit bears out how we have allowed continual, effectual change in our relationship with God.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by houston

Vas a ver...

See what?

[houston]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

See what?

See me tie my tie

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by houston

See me tie my tie

[Sam]

Originally Posted by houston

See me tie my tie

See my tie
See my bow tie
See me tie my tie
See me tie my bow tie

from the official "Guide to Altar Workers"

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

There is more evidence in the Book of Acts supporting tongues than against it.

Right; that's why Apo/Pents feel compelled to add to Acts 2:38--and furnish "Timmy" posts like yours here, rather than just quote some relevant Scripture.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The fruit of the spirit bears out how we have allowed continual, effectual change in our relationship with God.

It seems an easy test for this is,
"Are your borders increasing?"
Another would be to have a glossololia session,
and then 2 trusted "interpretations."
We both know the results there tho, I bet.

But rather than pick that scab, again, this part of your post seems more worth pursuing; but I don't get the relation to tongues. And I would have said it the other way:
"If we allow continual, effectual change (of our minds) in relationship to Christ, the fruit of the spirit will bear this out." I sub Christ for God, as Christ is our way to God.

[KWSS1976]

Too me it does not make any since to say anywhere else besides Pentecost was tongues not understood, the day tongues where spoken and everyone understood it, is the way it happened through the rest of the time tongues were present. To say that tongues is not an understood language by listeners is not biblical,cause the bible says no such thing, except in the book of Corith then if you are speaking in tongues "between you and god" as scripture states I should not hear you,just as the bible states.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Right; that's why Apo/Pents feel compelled to add to Acts 2:38--and furnish "Timmy" posts like yours here, rather than just quote some relevant Scripture.

I assumed anyone posting on an "Apostolic" forum would know them. You don't? I posted my first scripture reference with my first response.