My pastor's wife had broidered hair?

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Dordrecht

I am inviting the Hell's Angels to come in here!

No not going to say it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Help Lord.

[AreYouReady?]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

The Bible says long hair is a woman's glory NOT her burden.

You think that you are saying something profound with your short sentences, when in fact you have little knowledge or tolerance of life outside your little world.

But ... people like you have made the woman's glory to be a burden. Back in the day when these scriptures were written, women were not work horses on a time clock.

Not every woman can stay home and take care of the home, thus have time to take care of her glory.

People that think like you have no problem demanding and taking tithe money from another man's wife who must work to help support her family in the needful things of life. My work day was a 12-16 hour day, many days, at the job. Or it was 4-(12) hour days and 2 (8) hour days in a row before I got a couple days off. Then if I get more than 1 or 2 days off in a row, my telephone would ring for mandatory overtime.

This is when a womans "glory" can become a burden. As I said earlier, some workplaces are very nasty places to work at and a woman must clean her hair daily. If it is very long and thick, it can take an hour or more to clean and be presentable. The family needs momma after work and momma is tired, but still has chores to do before she is able to clean up and go to bed to be rested for another long day at work.

I hate it when men give a simple "snap your fingers" solution to something that they or (in many cases) their wives never have to experience.

Jesus said that His yoke is easy and His burden is light. I feel sorry for people who think that uncut hair is a more powerful salvation than the suffering and bloodshed of Christ on the cross. And like someone else said, uncut hair was not even a requirement in the law in the OT, which placed many burdens on people.

What are you uncut hair believers going to do when this country places a requirement on the women for mandatory military or civilian service that takes away the women from the home to serve the country? The first thing they do is cut the hair. Just like Obamacare, the government cares little for a person's religious views. Obamacare is requiring religious companies to provide insurance for abortion and for medications that induce abortions in women. So far Obamacare is prevailing over the lawsuits.

It is something to think about.

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by Dordrecht

I am inviting the Hell's Angels to come in here!

What makes you think there are not any here already?

[AreYouReady?]

Originally Posted by Cindy

What makes you think there are not any here already?

[MarieA27]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

The Bible says long hair is a woman's glory NOT her burden.

So if a woman's hair is 10 feet long, and would drag all across the ground as if it's a wedding dress, trailing behind her. And to keep it from dragging, she pins it up to try and make herself presentable and causes her head, neck and upper body to get sore, and have problems, are you saying that that's not a burden? Not to mention unseemly, and not decent.

The bible says that if she has long it is a glory to her, not uncut hair. The scripture clearly talks about two coverings, 1. The natural covering of her hair, and 2. Something to put on the hair. This whole uncut hair doctrine is so foolish, stupid and dumb. Stop lying on God, stop twisting what Paul said, stop lying on the bible. NO WHERE IN THE BIBLE DOES IT SAYS FOR WOMEN TO HAVE UNCUT HAIR!!!

It baffles me sometimes, how people take simpley plain scriptures and twist them up, and take deep scriptures at face value.

[MarieA27]

Also, the scripture only says for her to cover her head when she's praying or prophesying, so she really isn't under condemnation if her head is uncovered if shes not praying or prophesying. What also seems interesting, is that I wonder why you all aren't taking it to the extreme to have men always shave their heads bald, like you tell the women to never cut theirs.

They've set a limit for what is short for men, why can you all get together and set a length for what is long for women?

I believe in holiness and standards, where the principles are found in the bible. ..this uncut hair doctrine is not in the bible.

[navygoat1998]

Originally Posted by MarieA27

Also, the scripture only says for her to cover her head when she's praying or prophesying, so she really isn't under condemnation if her head is uncovered if shes not praying or prophesying. What also seems interesting, is that I wonder why you all aren't taking it to the extreme to have men always shave their heads bald, like you tell the women to never cut theirs.

They've set a limit for what is short for men, why can you all get together and set a length for what is long for women?

I believe in holiness and standards, where the principles are found in the bible. ..this uncut hair doctrine is not in the bible.

That's why I am holy.........and bald

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by MarieA27

So if a woman's hair is 10 feet long, and would drag all across the ground as if it's a wedding dress, trailing behind her. And to keep it from dragging, she pins it up to try and make herself presentable and causes her head, neck and upper body to get sore, and have problems, are you saying that that's not a burden? Not to mention unseemly, and not decent.

The bible says that if she has long it is a glory to her, not uncut hair. The scripture clearly talks about two coverings, 1. The natural covering of her hair, and 2. Something to put on the hair. This whole uncut hair doctrine is so foolish, stupid and dumb. Stop lying on God, stop twisting what Paul said, stop lying on the bible. NO WHERE IN THE BIBLE DOES IT SAYS FOR WOMEN TO HAVE UNCUT HAIR!!!

It baffles me sometimes, how people take simpley plain scriptures and twist them up, and take deep scriptures at face value.

The ONLY defined covering in this chapter is long hair. It is YOU that reads INTO the passage NOT I. Kind of like smelling your own bad breath.
"it is a shame for a woman to cut her hair" fight with Paul.

[MarieA27]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

The ONLY defined covering in this chapter is long hair. It is YOU that reads INTO the passage NOT I. Kind of like smelling your own bad breath.
"it is a shame for a woman to cut her hair" fight with Paul.

Shave, the bible says shave, not cut. Stop twisting scriptures.

[MarieA27]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

The ONLY defined covering in this chapter is long hair. It is YOU that reads INTO the passage NOT I. Kind of like smelling your own bad breath.
"it is a shame for a woman to cut her hair" fight with Paul.

So if the hair is the covering that Paul was talking about, is a man sinning or condemned, if he prays or prophesy with his hair not shaved completely off?