Highlights of 1098 tweets by a bombing suspect.

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Nice evasion. Please post the scriptures that condemn Dordrecht for being interested in reading the tweets of a bomber.

Dordrecht did nothing wrong in posting this thread, and doesn't deserve your attacks.

I agree, and he's lucky I wasn't the one that responded to his post.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Nice evasion. Please post the scriptures that condemn Dordrecht for being interested in reading the tweets of a bomber.

Dordrecht did nothing wrong in posting this thread, and doesn't deserve your attacks.

Working on it, sorry--will post another thread. I see that you feel I am attacking, when I am in fact defending. Scripture directs a believer, quite explicitly, to not be salaciously "peering in" upon misfortune; I am currently not at my preferred Bible-engine pc, but will reply with the relevant Scripture in another thread. Dordt knows the ref, btw; and I don't mean to imply that I am immune, or anything, ok?

[bbyrd009]

Said in a more or less private conversation would be bad enough; but coming from an ordained pastor, on a public forum supposedly representing Christianity, this thread amounts to a crime, imo. We'll argue it when I pull together the relevant ref's, if you will, as I don't wish to hijack Dordt's thread any further, ty.

[n david]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Said in a more or less private conversation would be bad enough; but coming from an ordained pastor, on a public forum supposedly representing Christianity, this thread amounts to a crime, imo.

Apparently a big chunk is missing/deleted from this thread. Amounts to a crime? Posting a link that shows some dumb tweets from one of the alleged terrorists?

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by n david

Apparently a big chunk is missing/deleted from this thread. Amounts to a crime? Posting a link that shows some dumb tweets from one of the alleged terrorists?

Well, one of my posts was removed, for comparing what Dordt is doing to porn, yes. "Posting a link that shows some dumb..." should be as far as a believer needs to read, to realize that they are in error. Again, I am easily--too easily--drawn into this sometimes, myself, and do not wish to seem superior here, or anything. I will do my best to generate a relevant thread on this asap, which will undoubtedly come across as preachy, as well.

I like--or at least respect--much of what these posters have to say in other areas, so please don't get the wrong idea. I am subject to take 'the other side' against Dordt simply because I note it has produced light in the past, and he seems to be un-offendable, as I am. Peace!