Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:00 PM
seekerman seekerman is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny View Post
Acts 2:38 is as much part of the gospel as the cross.
This is a very good example of the mindset of oneness Pentecostalism which was presented in Thomas Fudge's excellent book "Christianity Without the Cross".
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:03 PM
Pliny Pliny is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,678
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lemon View Post
I am just trying to ask a question and understand full well the Apostolic viewpoint - I did not roll out of bed into church yesterday.

Even Jeff Arnold will tell you that the gospel is not ACTS 2:38 - it can be stated that it is the response but it certainly is not the gospel.

I am also friends with men like Chester Wright who will not take the position of sending AG folks to hell over the titles baptism. He will not emphatically state that he knows they are saved, but he also will not state they are not. when he and I talked he simply stated "I hope so" - this is someone who is invited to preach at many "trinitarian" pentecostal churches.

The only thing I find hard to grasp is taking a hard line stance on this - Cornelieus may have been taught more truth, but was still considered a man mighty in the scriptures. Like I said, I am not waffling on how I would baptize, just curious on the absolute dogmatic approach....

Maybe I should have kept it to myself...
No you should not IMO. Sincere questions should never be kept to yourself. You have a sincere question and though you may agree or disagree there is nothing wrong with asking the question.

As you can tell in my post I absolutely believe in the necessity of Jesus name baptism. Why? Because it is FOR the remission of sins which has everything to do with the gospel. There is only one gospel.

I hope I am wrong if that makes sense but I would not count on that.
The ancient church believed baptism was part of the new birth - universally.
The ancient church believed baptism was for the remission of sins - universally.
The ancient church recognized Jesus name baptism as the most ancient form of baptism.

It was Trinitarian theology that changed baptism (Jesus name baptism) by emphasizing the need to be baptized into the trinity (titles Father, Son and Holy Ghost). A little leaven leavens the whole lump.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:04 PM
Jason B Jason B is offline
Saved by Grace


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny View Post

Remission of sins has everything to do with the gospel.
And sins are forgiven/remitted by baptism in Jesus' name.

Ignorance is bliss and some people are exceedingly blissful.
I baptize in Jesus name. But salvation doesn't have anything in my opinion to do with the words spoken in baptism, but with the faith of the person being baptized. I think Romans 4 is pretty clear about this and in particular verse 10.

Baptism in JN is proper because His name was invoked it is biblically and historically supported that the early church baptized invoking the name of Jesus. Paul suggest that baptism was carried out in the name of the person who was crucified for us in 1 Cor 1:13. And of course baptism is an expression of obedience, faith, and identification with Christ. But we go to far to say if certain words aren't spoken in baptism someones sins are not remitted.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards

"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship

"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:17 PM
Jack Shephard's Avatar
Jack Shephard Jack Shephard is offline
Strange in a Strange Land...


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Island
Posts: 5,512
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

The Gospel has nothing to do with Acts at all. Acts is a book of the bible sure, but Acts also means works & works has nothing to do with salvation.
__________________
"If we don't learn to live together we're gonna die alone"
Jack Shephard.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:24 PM
Pliny Pliny is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,678
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo View Post
I baptize in Jesus name. But salvation doesn't have anything in my opinion to do with the words spoken in baptism, but with the faith of the person being baptized. I think Romans 4 is pretty clear about this and in particular verse 10.

Baptism in JN is proper because His name was invoked it is biblically and historically supported that the early church baptized invoking the name of Jesus. Paul suggest that baptism was carried out in the name of the person who was crucified for us in 1 Cor 1:13. And of course baptism is an expression of obedience, faith, and identification with Christ. But we go to far to say if certain words aren't spoken in baptism someones sins are not remitted.
The same book of Romans where Paul elaborates on baptism being in HIM not them!?!? Romans 6.

The same book of Romans that the way to walk in new life is to be baptized in HIM not them!?!? Romans 6:5.

We clearly disagree but I appreciate the spirit of your post. I am glad you baptize in Jesus' name and I hope and pray you will lean more my direction.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:26 PM
seekerman seekerman is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

Bottom line, making it simple, it doesn't matter what another man utters while immersing someone.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:38 PM
n david n david is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Shephard View Post
The Gospel has nothing to do with Acts at all. Acts is a book of the bible sure, but Acts also means works & works has nothing to do with salvation.
The bolded is only partly correct. The Gospel is not the book of Acts, but the book of Acts is the response to the Gospel; so Acts does have something to do with the Gospel. The response to the Gospel is described through the Acts of the Apostles. It's not that it means works and works has nothing to do with salvation. Acts is the actions which the Apostles did in response to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It's a historical record of the events of the early church.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:40 PM
Ferd's Avatar
Ferd Ferd is offline
I remain the Petulant Chevalier


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,524
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Shephard View Post
The Gospel has nothing to do with Acts at all. Acts is a book of the bible sure, but Acts also means works & works has nothing to do with salvation.

oh good grief.

if acts means work, then repenting is work.

no difference at all.

doublegoodgrief.
__________________
If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
My Countdown Counting down to: Days left till the end of the opressive Texas Summer!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:42 PM
Ferd's Avatar
Ferd Ferd is offline
I remain the Petulant Chevalier


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,524
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

The Gospel is the death buriel and resurection of Jesus Christ.

Peter preached the Gospel in Acts 2. the people were "pricked in their hearts" and asked what they needed to do.

Peter told them. I fail to understand why we are still arguing with Peter.... the man Jebus told to tell folk what to do?

triplegoodgrief.
__________________
If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
My Countdown Counting down to: Days left till the end of the opressive Texas Summer!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:50 PM
The Lemon The Lemon is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 449
Re: Well Technically Speaking....

I appreciate the input here...iron sharpens iron. Just for the record - asking a question and havving a good discussion about the Word is not always the same as arguing away the truth of the Word.

People need to be able to discuss, ask questions and rightly divide - not be made to feel lost and inferior for bringing something to the table to discuss - be it salvation or our favorite...holiness..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speaking from beyond the grave... Jack Shephard Fellowship Hall 38 12-16-2011 04:20 PM
Speaking in Tongues? CaliTeacher74 Café Blog-a-bit 28 08-09-2010 09:00 PM
How Do You Know if God is Speaking to You? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 52 10-06-2008 12:30 PM
Speaking of Altars.... Praxeas Fellowship Hall 1 09-18-2008 10:11 PM
Im a technically challenged Duh Head Fonix Tech Talk: with Bit & Byte 1 03-22-2007 05:38 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.