End Time Army of Women Preachers Psalms 68:11 - Page 115

Pliny · #**1141** 02-17-2014, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

Seriously, you guys are speaking out of both sides of your mouth. On one hand, you say women cannot teach men. On the other, you say they can.

Is witnessing not teaching? If I tell someone something they don't know, I have taught them something, whether you want to admit it or not. How I do it, whether on the phone, behind a pulpit, standing on a rock, or performing sign language makes no difference.

If women cannot teach, then they cannot TEACH! I didn't see Paul giving out exceptions in the scriptures you are claiming where he said WOMEN CANNOT TEACH MEN, do you?

Once again...
Everyone should witness and seek to be used in the gifts of the Spirit. The leading of the church, the teaching and preaching - feeding God's flock is the role of a man. The fact that so many women cannot understand that basic fundamental fact is an object lesson in why women should not be allowed to do so. The feeding of the flock is to the elders (Acts 20:17; 28). These elders are the bishops that were the husbands of one wife.

To take this logic would mean that no one needs a shepherd because they can all teach some body some thing. It is this spirit precisely that Got Miriam and Aaron into trouble.

Pliny · #**1142** 02-17-2014, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

I'm wondering why any man who truly believes that women are not to teach them would want to waste time with this issue?

Seriously, if I don't believe someone has the right to talk to me, the last thing I'd be doing is talking to them!

Don't you boys have anything else better to do?

It is called the Bible. My calling includes defending doctrine. Don't you women have anything better to do than try to act like a man?

Pliny · #**1143** 02-17-2014, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

What does being in a synagogue have to do with anything?

If you are referring to the post concerning Apollos, the synagogue has everything to do with it. Its called context. Apollos was at the synagogue and this is where Aquila and Priscilla saw him. AFTERWARDS they spoke with him. See that? Priscilla was not a leader of the synagogue. Indeed she could NOT be. This husband and wife met with Apollos privately - it was not a church service where Priscilla had stepped out of the created order and was teaching Apollos. THEY were witnessing to him.

The difference that seems to elude so many is the difference between a formal teaching event characterized by the assembly of the body and a private moment between people. The difference between a pastor teaching and people witnessing. The elders are to feed the flock, that is with the word of God. Those elders, by qualification, are men.

Pliny · #**1144** 02-17-2014, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

So, women teaching men OUTSIDE the synagogue is perfectly ok.

Again, where do you find Paul mentioning that in scripture?

I have documented over and over...

The elders were called upon to feed the flock of God (Acts 20). There is a difference between a pastor teaching and people witnessing. To ignore this is to assume no one needs a pastor after all doesn't God speak to everyone? It is precisely this spirit that got Miriam and Aaron in trouble.

Praxeas · #**1145** 02-17-2014, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pliny

If you are referring to the post concerning Apollos, the synagogue has everything to do with it. Its called context. Apollos was at the synagogue and this is where Aquila and Priscilla saw him. AFTERWARDS they spoke with him. See that? Priscilla was not a leader of the synagogue. Indeed she could NOT be. This husband and wife met with Apollos privately - it was not a church service where Priscilla had stepped out of the created order and was teaching Apollos. THEY were witnessing to him.

The difference that seems to elude so many is the difference between a formal teaching event characterized by the assembly of the body and a private moment between people. The difference between a pastor teaching and people witnessing. The elders are to feed the flock, that is with the word of God. Those elders, by qualification, are men.

So its ok as long as its not in a church service?

RJR · #**1146** 02-17-2014, 07:28 PM

Pliny and rdp

I have given to the work in Brazil, however, I will not again for the reasons promoted on this thread and in newsletters. When egregious errors have been pointed out on this thread that is both inconsistent with scripture, and historical facts, what takes place? They ignore what is embarrassingly false, and copy and paste hoping that if enough is thrown maybe something might stick. Clearly, what is promoted as scholarly is embarrassing and sadly an attempt to justify what is clearly in error. It is promoted here that if one is submission to her husband at home there can be a role reversal at church, or perhaps she can, as a preacher, then exercise authority over some other woman's husband. Just how messed up is that? Could a woman, come as Paul with not just love, but also a rod, and still not take authority over either her husband, or some one else's husband? If a woman could not come with a rod is she then in an inferior role in the ministry? 1 Cor 4:21

Many who have posted on threads, beyond this one, is apostate. Many do not believe in Biblical standards of separation, and too many are not even oneness. Trinitarians are defended here, aff you are an embarrassment to oneness Pentecost, I hope all of you who view this as your admiration social site are proud.

RJR · #**1147** 02-17-2014, 08:47 PM

Sis Alvear, did all these other women you have mentioned you set under, did they pastor you? How many pastors have you had? I think you meant you have heard them preach, if I considered everyone I have heard preach as sitting under them, I think both you and I would have to say we have sit under a lot of preachers. I also think you look up to them because they agree with you.