End Time Army of Women Preachers Psalms 68:11

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

“Better theTorah be burned than to be studied by a woman” (P. Sotah, 3:4). The Babylonian version states, “He who teaches his daughter the law teaches her tiflut,” variously translated as frivolity, lasciviousness or sin (B. Sotah, 20a)

And the beat rolls on... ROTFL!!!

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Instead, those basing their view of women on the oral law did. Paul never required women to be silent and never called female speaking “lewd and filthy.” The Talmud was guilty of advocating both. This is further confirmed in verse 36 when Paul exclaims..“What! Did the Word of God originate with you?”..The..“What!”..indicates that Paul is not in harmony with what was stated by others from the Talmud in vv.34-35...Thayer’s Lexicon notes that the..“What”..is a disjunctive conjunction..“before a sentence contrary to the one just preceding, to indicate that if one be denied or refuted the other must stand.”

LOL!!! Here we go again with the mythical man writing about something that was not written yet! ROTFL!!!

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Paul is making a quotation from the letter addressed to him by the Corinthians whenever he alludes to their knowledge, or when any statement stands in marked contrast either with the immediate context or with Paul’s known views.”..Paul contrasts his commands which promote edification by the varied contributions of all with the restrictive prohibitions upon women demanded by the anti-gospel Talmud. Paul saw the voices of the sisters as a vital part of the building up of the body of Messiah. The Talmud, on the other hand, viewed female voices as “shameful” and as “filthy nakedness.”

How do you know when somebody does not love truth? Answer when they have been confronted with truth yet love their own private interpretation anyway.


The mythical man writing about a non-existent book.


This decline in the number of knowledgeable Jews seems to have been a decisive factor in Rabbi Judah the Prince's decision around the year 200 C.E. to record in writing the Oral Law.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/..._&_mishna.html

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by RJR

So according to Roxanne, THE woman cannot speak in the home according to 1 Tim 2. She must learn in silence with all subjection, no questions to be asked as at home according to Roxannes position of 1 Tim 2:12, even though she is instructed to ask her husband at home, 1 Cor 14:35.

Where is she commanded to be in silence specifically? In the home...NO! She is specifically commanded to be in silence IN THE CHURCH, for it is NOT PERMITTED for her to speak, for it is a shame. I am sorry Roxanne, you cannot get around the specific injunctions in these passages.

Robertson's Word Studies, says of 1 Tim 2:12 that even though in modern times women teaches Sunday School classes, she is not permitted to speak "in a public meeting." It is amazing that Vincent's, Robertson's and many others when giving Word studies on 1 Tim 2:12 parallel it to 1 Cor. 14:35.

Roxanne, it was Prophets, Apostles, and Jesus' teachings that God chose to build His church upon, not a woman among them. Not one woman among all the OT priesthood. Not one instruction as to the qualifications of a female deacon or bishop. Deborah and Huldah was not involved in tabernacle or temple priesthood.

I could not agree more that a woman is under her head, her husband. She is not to exercise authority over him. I know a single girl at home is also under her father. However, to imply that both husband and wife do not have anyone over them is to deny Heb. 13:7, 13, 24. 1 Thes. 5:12, 1 Tim 5:17, 1 Pet 5:2, Acts 20:28. By the way, a woman would not qualify for any of these offices that are given the oversight. According to your position, a woman cannot exercise authority over her husband but she could someone else's husband. How consistent!?

I would recommend you read the entire Bible it would really inform you, but will contradict your preconceived ideas.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Oxford University must think different....He got his degree there....No one that would differ with you in your opinion is right....

No one that differs with the Bible is right.

ROTFL

[Sasha]

The mockery I am seeing among those who claim to be ministry here is revolting. Some of you I have never met and if I ever find out who you are in real life, I never will. Any respect I might have had is totally gone.

I'm sure God is shaking His head at the ignorance here as much as I am.

But I'm sure you don't care what I think.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Sasha

The mockery I am seeing among those who claim to be ministry here is revolting. Some of you I have never met and if I ever find out who you are in real life, I never will. Any respect I might have had is totally gone.

I'm sure God is shaking His head at the ignorance here as much as I am.

But I'm sure you don't care what I think.

And it is revolting to see someone who claims to have a calling ignore the facts. BTW did you ever read about what John the Baptist called people who refused to accept facts and stick with their own tradition?

How about Jesus with a whip in the temple?

Paul even called the people of Corinth arrogant.

And I am positive you have completely ignored the arrogance and mockery coming from another person who claims to have a calling but believes in women preachers. Seems like I read something about that kind of thinking somewhere... I think John the Baptist even had a choice word for that...

[Sister Alvear]

I do not know all about all Brother Scheels debates but I do know that The church of Christ preacher quit before his time was up!

[RJR]

Bro Sheel debated another Apostolic on the subject of women preachers. I have no confidence in church of Christless preachers.

However, even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in awhile.

[RJR]

Rudy Burrows was the preachers name.