All Trinitarians are Lost!!!!!!!!!!!

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Sean

Jeremy, I bailed on that one so as not to humiliate you for such a ridiculous statement you made. Just move on....

It's not humiliating when there isn't any pride.

Please, do not hold back.

For real.

[Abiding Now]

Here let me help.

deed
ergon
er'-gon
From ἔργω ergō (a primary but obsolete word; to work); toil (as an effort or occupation); by implication an act: - deed, doing, labour, work.

[Jermyn Davidson]

That chapter is talking about one's entire lifestyle, giving instruction for how we should conduct our everyday lives under the AUTHORITY of the One who purchased our salvation with His Precious Blood.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Dichotomy Girl

Not to mention that it brings into question the importance of using the right form of His name. Because Jesus is (to quote wikipedia) the Latin form of the Greek version of the hebrew name....

I mean, lets be honest, those who sat at His feet....didn't call him "Jesus", so it seems kind of ridiculous to think that he would demand itas a condition for salvation...

Actually, the Greek name for Jesus was originally Iesous(sounds like....eesus)....Just say it and you will notice how close it is to the English translation...Jesus. Our Lord knows what we are saying.

[Abiding Now]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

That chapter is talking about one's entire lifestyle, giving instruction for how we should conduct our everyday lives under the AUTHORITY of the One who purchased our salvation with His Precious Blood.

Is that anything like being baptized under the authority of Jesus WITHOUT calling his name.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Sean

Actually, the Greek name for Jesus was originally Iesous(sounds like....eesus)....Just say it and you will notice how close it is to the English translation...Jesus. Our Lord knows what we are saying.

What we are saying, our intents, our thoughts...

Our GOD is all-knowing and MERCIFUL-- the source of Grace and HE IS TRUTH!

[Originalist]

[QUOTE=Abiding Now;1325047][QUOTE=Originalist;1324914]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Typical trinitarian answer. Did Jimmy Swaggart teach you that also?

Trinitarians do not believe that baptism is "in order that your sins might be remitted". I do believe and teach that.

Once again you make mindless, misleading, and unwarranted remarks.

Again, my remarks were aimed at a doctrine, held by people like you, who are so arrogant as to think that God has narrowed his willingness to forgive sins to a preacher's gum flapping. That remark is not aimed at all preachers. Rather it is aimed at preachers I just described.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Abiding Now

Is that anything like being baptized under the authority of Jesus WITHOUT calling his name.

It can be done.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Abiding Now

Is that anything like being baptized under the authority of Jesus WITHOUT calling his name.

What is more important ,and actually more Biblical, is the one being baptized calling on his name.

[Dichotomy Girl]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

If I get married and the magistrate or preacher doesn't invoke the Name of Jesus at the end of the ceremony, is my marriage void?

You know what's funny, I'm from the North, and so when my Atheist husband had our shotgun wedding at the courthouse, I was thinking that courthouse = secular ceremony. I was not really thinking about the fact that I live in a small county in the Bible belt! So it was all Jesus, this ,and Jesus that. At the time, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry, I kept thinking Josh was going to bolt or Object!

But as she did pronounce us husband and wife (by the power invested in her by the state of Georgia and the Lord Jesus Christ), so I confess, I have teased my husband about it a time or two...