Why I Am A Futurist - Page 50

Bowas · #**491** 03-02-2015, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disciple4life

Darby's teachings of dispensationalism and eschatology were popularized with the Scofield study bible.

Hubbard started the church of scientology after his career of being a science fiction writer. To me it seems his former profession helped him create a new religion out of fantasy.

As far as what Sean is talking about, who knows.

I scream, you scream, we all scream for Ice Cream!

I agree with the false teachings and fantasy religion both brought on, and one of them wrought so much false doctrine upon Christianly that many today really believe.
Both are fantasy.

Sean · #**492** 03-02-2015, 06:56 PM

I take bits and pieces from folks concepts these days. I wont line myself up entirely with any group.
Every group I have ever seen has been laced with lies.

shag · #**493** 03-02-2015, 07:23 PM

Sean, do you believe in transubstantiation?

Sean · #**494** 03-02-2015, 08:00 PM

No

mfblume · #**495** 03-02-2015, 08:39 PM

Folks, futility personified.

mfblume · #**496** 03-02-2015, 08:53 PM

1 Corinthians 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

The resurrection makes the bodies immortal, not leaves. You deny the word, Sean. By thinking you are faithful to one passage, your interpretation is proved false by forcing you to deny another passage. This is how error is exposed.

When the dead are raised, they are then at that moment incorruptible. Your interpretation denies that.

Sean · #**497** 03-02-2015, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

1 Corinthians 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

The resurrection makes the bodies immortal, not leaves. You deny the word, Sean. By thinking you are faithful to one passage, your interpretation is proved false by forcing you to deny another passage. This is how error is exposed.

When the dead are raised, they are then at that moment incorruptible. Your interpretation denies that.

Yep, in the afterlife, thats when the tree is revealed to the saints....boy Mike, you finally got it...YAY!

My sister in law went to the Tree of Life last year, she is there as we speak!

mfblume · #**498** 03-02-2015, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean

Yep, in the afterlife, thats when the tree is revealed to the saints....boy Mike, you finally got it...YAY!

My sister in law went to the Tree of Life last year, she is there as we speak!

No. It did not say our bodies are made immortal by leaves from the tree. lol. It says when they are raised they are raised immortal. Leaves have nothing to do with it.

I think this is the most ridiculous conversation I ever had. Unbelievable. And you do not even have a church.

Bowas · #**499** 03-02-2015, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

1 Corinthians 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

The resurrection makes the bodies immortal, not leaves. You deny the word, Sean. By thinking you are faithful to one passage, your interpretation is proved false by forcing you to deny another passage. This is how error is exposed.

When the dead are raised, they are then at that moment incorruptible. Your interpretation denies that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean

Yep, in the afterlife, thats when the tree is revealed to the saints....boy Mike, you finally got it...YAY!

My sister in law went to the Tree of Life last year, she is there as we speak!

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

No. It did not say our bodies are made immortal by leaves from the tree. lol. It says when they are raised they are raised immortal. Leaves have nothing to do with it.

I think this is the most ridiculous conversation I ever had. Unbelievable. And you do not even have a church.

Kind of what I was thinking. lol
Not surprising how Sean comes up with some of his ideas, when he totally misconstrues what is being written on these posts.

You showed that at the resurrection were raised immortal and nowhere in the passage did it infer anything about eating leaves to attain or maintain immortality.

(I am sorry about your sister Sean)

Sean · #**500** 03-02-2015, 10:46 PM

Thanks bro. she is at the Tree of Life in the New Jerusalem, no matter how absurd you guys think it is.....

22 But ye(living saints) are come unto (#1)mount Sion, and unto the (#2)city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem(where my sister in law is now), and (#3)to an innumerable company of angels,

23 (#4)To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and(#5) to God the Judge of all, and (#6)to the spirits of just men made perfect,(she is now here in the New Jerusalem as a spirit of just men made perfect)

She is there now...Revelation 22

22 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.

2 In the midst of the street of it(New Jerusalem), and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.(she will never have cancer again)....

She made it...14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city....She has a right to the tree of life in the New Jerusalem city!