Inter-Denominational Fellowship

[Tithesmeister]

Originally Posted by n david

What do you mean?

Two denominations fellowshipping together PCI and PAJC combined to make the new UPCI. I think they agreed to overlook some differences and decided to pursue unity of the faith.

[BuckeyeBukaroo]

Outside of a wedding or a funeral, I do not see how "Inter-Denominational Fellowship" can be a positive thing.

[Old Paths]

Originally Posted by Tithesmeister

Two denominations fellowshipping together PCI and PAJC combined to make the new UPCI. I think they agreed to overlook some differences and decided to pursue unity of the faith.

"overlook some differences and decided to pursue unity of the faith"

Yeah, like whether the Blood is applies at repentance or water baptism in Jesus Name.

Look where that got them.

[Old Paths]

2Cor 6:14 Be not unequally yoked with unbelievers: for what fellowship have righteousness and iniquity? or what communion hath light with darkness?

2Cor6:15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what portion hath a believer with an unbeliever?

2Cor 6:16 And what agreement hath a temple of God with idols? for we are a temple of the living God; even as God said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

2Cor 6:17 Wherefore Come ye out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, And touch no unclean thing; And I will receive you,

2Cor 6:18 And will be to you a Father, And ye shall be to me sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

[houston]

Originally Posted by Tithesmeister

Two denominations fellowshipping together PCI and PAJC combined to make the new UPCI. I think they agreed to overlook some differences and decided to pursue unity of the faith.

Yes, and if you believe the account of those that highjacked the fellowship in the 90’s, the merger was done with the “understanding” that the PCI would eventually become ardent 3 steppers.

[houston]

Originally Posted by Old Paths

2Cor 6:14 Be not unequally yoked with unbelievers: for what fellowship have righteousness and iniquity? or what communion hath light with darkness?

2Cor6:15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what portion hath a believer with an unbeliever?

2Cor 6:16 And what agreement hath a temple of God with idols? for we are a temple of the living God; even as God said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

2Cor 6:17 Wherefore Come ye out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, And touch no unclean thing; And I will receive you,

2Cor 6:18 And will be to you a Father, And ye shall be to me sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

Are you saying that the PCI group was a bunch of carousers?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Tithesmeister

Two denominations fellowshipping together PCI and PAJC combined to make the new UPCI. I think they agreed to overlook some differences and decided to pursue unity of the faith.

They also agreed on basic doctrine:

"The basic and fundamental doctrine of this organization shall be the Bible standard of full salvation, which is repentance, baptism in water by immersion in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the baptism of the Holy Ghost with the initial sign of speaking with other tongues as the Spirit gives utterance."

Are you meaning the Baptists, Methodists and CoG merging together? I don't see that, either. Even though they have more in common together than would they and A/P.

[Old Paths]

Originally Posted by houston

Are you saying that the PCI group was a bunch of carousers?

NOPE

What I was trying to say was the PCI did NOT believe the New Birth John 3:5/Acts 2:38 message. All the PAJC did at the merger was swallow the false doctrine of saved without a he Holy Ghost.

[houston]

Originally Posted by Old Paths

NOPE

What I was trying to say was the PCI did NOT believe the New Birth John 3:5/Acts 2:38 message. All the PAJC did at the merger was swallow the false doctrine of saved without a he Holy Ghost.

So you quote scripture about fornicating?

Alrighty

[houston]

And I did get your point, initially.