Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Amanah

what I want to know is being that men are the hegemon of society, why do they want to be females?

is it because it is easier then stepping up to the plate and taking responsibility?

none of this was possible before birth control.

Well, the liberal argument around here is that a woman who wears pants doesn't want to be a man. Therefore a man who wears a dress doesn't want to be a female. It is all humanistic, and has noting to do with the Bible. They argue till their blue in the face how Deuteronomy 22:5 has noting to do with pants, but are confused to the man dresses which are creeping into fashion.
Sooner or later Churchanity will be swallowed up whole by Leviathan.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Well, the liberal argument around here is that a woman who wears pants doesn't want to be a man. Therefore a man who wears a dress doesn't want to be a female. It is all humanistic, and has noting to do with the Bible. They argue till their blue in the face how Deuteronomy 22:5 has noting to do with pants, but are confused to the man dresses which are creeping into fashion.
Sooner or later Churchanity will be swallowed up whole by Leviathan.

It all goes hand and hand, and if they went to Apostilic church and all the men there came in men's dresses, they would think something was wrong there. Why, because there's scripture against it! But if the whole congregation of women come in womens pants they won't say anything and even argue for its acceptance.

Once again as a smart man said "before you tear down a fence, findout why it's there in the first place!" Or the next thing you know RuPaul might be your Pastor! They already have homosexual organizations of Apostolics, I bet you they don't preach against Deuteronomy 22:5 either...

[houston]

Women began to wear pants for functional reasons (workforce). There’s no reason for a man to adapt to a dress.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by houston

Women began to wear pants for functional reasons (workforce). There’s no reason for a man to adapt to a dress.

Workforce? What job requires that a female wears pants? Flipping burgers at Denny"s? Rosie the Riveter was the candy cigarettes to get everyone on board. Jaden Smith is the next wave to the grave.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by houston

Women began to wear pants for functional reasons (workforce). There’s no reason for a man to adapt to a dress.

Oh there's a workforce these guys may need it for, the oldest profession in the world in fact.

[houston]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Oh there's a workforce these guys may need it for, the oldest profession in the world in fact.

I respect you. So don’t get stupid with my.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by houston

I respect you. So don’t get stupid with my.

Huh??

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Oh there's a workforce these guys may need it for, the oldest profession in the world in fact.

Workforce "female" pants was back in the 40s. Now it doesn't even phase the population around us that a woman would wear pants. Same thing will eventually happen with male dresses. While we are still in a place where the population can't understand the need for a guy to wear a dress. It is being shown to the young first. All in the name of fashion. The church was consumed during the 60s and 70s, with pants on women. She had to figure out how to win the lost, and figure out the pants on women. By the 1980s she was on the ropes. The AoG lost whatever holiness she had left, and the UPCI was the last one (with all the other Apostolics and holiness groups) carried the torch. Old time Church of God tried to hold out in some places she still does But the noose tightens. While we are arguing about the Greek word κομάω (which means to have growing hair) and Deuteronomy 22:5 well, talking about how it means a woman wearing armour. The devil and the legions of high places laugh. Jaden Smith is a convenient pawn, in the hands of a spirit realm many in the church no longer even talk about. While we poke fun at Serpent handlers interpretation of Mark 16:17-18, sadly some Pentecostal churches never cast out a single demon. Might scare the visitors away during Mother's Day Memorial? Anyway, looks like it is chip, chip, chip away. Little by little, year by year. Marlene Dietrich blew people away when she dressed like a man on the movie screens. While the preacher blew hot lava across the pulpits because it was crossdressing. Oh, but we don't want to offend anyone. So, no one was offended. Pants for women multiplied, it became normal. The frog in the kettle got comfortable, the heat rose a wee bit higher. Until Mad Max went from being the Road Warrior to getting a He Woman with one arm save him on a Fury Road. Way to go Rosie the Riveter. Strong like Bull, Smart like Tractor.

Old Time Pentecost! How dare you say All Trinitarians are going to Hell! How can you say that a woman wearing pants will lose her soul. That a man wearing lipstick, eyeliner, and painted fingernails is going to skid across the floor of hell with sparks flying off his soul. Oh, that guy is real, he is a cashier at our Home Depot. Good job church, right on. I can find no Bible for that Brother B. OK, ok, some people aint got enough Holy Ghost to figure out that they are slipping into darkness. Sad thing is, they probably don't care if they do.

[Evang.Benincasa]

By the way, why are beards the mark of the beast?

How about the mark of the Beat Nick.

Maynard Krebs.

Contemplate this on the Tree of Woe.

[Esaias]

I can't really explain it with words, but there's a definite difference between these two:





The first one is quaint, archaic, traditional. The second one is just plain revolting.

Personally, I think "society" is itself becoming a quaint, archaic, near-useless word.