Is Acts 2:38 your god?

[SDG]

Originally Posted by COOPER

Very interesting what Jeff Arnold said.
To apply such strong holds on standards and manuals will cause the man of God to tune out the voice of God.:
Traditions and those that govern such and the "don't touch my rules" attitudes, will cause the man of God to loose sight of God.
Man has built the gaurd rails so far away from the edge of the cliff, that it is hard to find the path. The narrow path has become a razors edge.

JA also quipped that the manual now weighs some inordinate weight ... I can't agree with you more Coop.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Your methodology is even clearer ... PP.

I have simply posed questions in this thread ...

and you make divisive assertions ... what gives, Bro????

You're sounding like them.

Why, Dear Daniel, did you "simply pose questions" of such an insulting nature?
To suggest that Acts 2:38 believers and adherents may be idolaters?

Who is divisive?

Your camp brought this whole issue to the fore and won't let it go. If you don't want divisiveness, quit talking about things you know we vehemently disagree on.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

This accusation would have applied to Peter, I guess, and his compatriots in Jerusalem.

Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned.




There are three things the devil hates; the Doctrine, the Name, and the Blood.

These were the things that infuriated the high priest and his minions.

I am reading posts from folks who want to de-emphasize the doctrine, explain why the Name isn't necessary, and confuse the message of the Blood.

This is an old and time honored strategy.

Congratulations.

I see questions ... no accusations CS ... but you can spin the DE-EMPHASIS record all day ....

[Felicity]

Oops........

I'm in the wrong thread. LOL! Thot I was in the same one I've been posting in.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Why, Dear Daniel, did you "simply pose questions" of such an insulting nature?
To suggest that Acts 2:38 believers and adherents may be idolaters?

Who is divisive?

Your camp brought this whole issue to the fore and won't let it go. If you don't want divisiveness, quit talking about things you know we vehemently disagree on.

This coming from a someone who accused many within the movement of spiritual abortion ... we're here to opine not censor PP.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Why, Dear Daniel, did you "simply pose questions" of such an insulting nature?
To suggest that Acts 2:38 believers and adherents may be idolaters?

Who is divisive?

Your camp brought this whole issue to the fore and won't let it go. If you don't want divisiveness, quit talking about things you know we vehemently disagree on.

Just for the record Ron thought they were legitimate questions ....

[COOPER]

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

This accusation would have applied to Peter, I guess, and his compatriots in Jerusalem.

Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned.




There are three things the devil hates; the Doctrine, the Name, and the Blood.

These were the things that infuriated the high priest and his minions.

I am reading posts from folks who want to de-emphasize the doctrine, explain why the Name isn't necessary, and confuse the message of the Blood.This is an old and time honored strategy.

Congratulations.

I would never.

[LadyChocolate]

so. anyone want some pizza?

[COOPER]

Originally Posted by LadyChocolate

so. anyone want some pizza?

Meat lovers- pan, please.

[LadyChocolate]

Originally Posted by COOPER

meat lovers, pan , please.

That's the only way to have it...........and anyone who disagrees with me doesn't believe in acts 2:38!