Alex you have been aptly answered you rejected the answer. Rejection of the answer does not mean the question has not been answered.
"for her hair is given for a COVERING" is the ONLY noun there the other covered and uncovered are adjectives NOT nouns.
Thus the ONLY defined covering is long hair (komao) let her hair grow.
I'm glad that you fufill the Scripture about wrestling to your own destruction, and not me.
-Bro. Alex
Understanding where you are, and knowing what life has in store for you gives me no comfort Alex.
Maturity comes to all of us. For some it is a painful process. You need to spend more time listening to folk like Falla and less time making pronouncements. It will help you immensely…. And save you no end of pain.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
Many good studies are available on the net proving the veil should be worn during prayer or prophecy in the meeting. Thats my own belief sice the 70's.
The belief it must always be worn is not common among Pentecostals that teach this.
However MOST Apostolic Pentecostals do teach it is a sin for a woman to trim her hair.
If it must be worn during prayer, then it seems logical that a woman should wear her veil all the time, lest she find herself in the position of needing to talk to God without her covering handy.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Replaced "covered" with "uncut hair" and "uncovered" to "without hair" and see what happens to that chapter. The uncut hair teaching is one of the biggest misinterpretations of Scripture in regards to holiness by OP people. The uncut hair teaching is a lie- GOD help you!
-Bro. Alex
Are you disagreeing with what he said? Or just how he said it?
I Cor. 11: 6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
We say that 'be not covered' means she's cut her hair. And shorn means 'cut, at all'. So this verse reads:
6For if the woman's hair is cut, let her also cut her hair:
Makes absolutely no sense.
Paul was writing to them about headcoverings. Physical headcoverings. He was saying that just as nature covers women with long hair, women should cover themselves with a headcovering. And if they refuse to wear a headcovering, they might as well cut all of their hair off, it's just as much a shame.
I'm glad that you fufill the Scripture about wrestling to your own destruction, and not me.
-Bro. Alex
I really don't understand why you are so disrespectful to people who don't agree with your views. You do understand that we're all Christians here, right?
No one here is seeking "destruction" simply because they interpret a passage of scripture in a way you find objectionable.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
I Cor. 11: 6.. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.We say that 'be not covered' means she's cut her hair... And shorn means 'cut, at all'... So this verse reads:..6For if the woman's hair is cut, let her also cut her hair:.. Makes absolutely no sense.Paul was writing to them about headcoverings... Physical headcoverings... He was saying that just as nature covers women with long hair, women should cover themselves with a headcovering.
The passage is very simple "if a woman be not covered(uncut hair) let her be shorn(allow her to worship with cut hair) since she is allowing her hair to grow(let her be covered.)Those new converts some of them were the 'shorn women' however they had come into the church they could not grow their hair out overnight yet they had repented let them be with the understanding let them be covered or they are allowing their hair to grow.
If it must be worn during prayer, then it seems logical that a woman should wear her veil all the time, lest she find herself in the position of needing to talk to God without her covering handy.
True and the amazing thing to me it they shout their hats off?????
Linear Mode
