Imgood.me?

[Jeffrey]

Holiness battle LOL

Classical Pentecostal Soteriology and Pneumatology would be more stimulating.

On the Trinity and Oneness, Dulle would be good to hear.

Who is Poe?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Holiness battle LOL

Classical Pentecostal Soteriology and Pneumatology would be more stimulating.

On the Trinity and Oneness, Dulle would be good to hear.

Who is Poe?

My bad, had Curt Fee in mind ....

Then Gordon Fee came .... to mind .... then I don't know how I got Poe ...

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by DAII

My bad, had Curt Fee in mind ....

Then Gordon Fee came .... to mind .... then I don't know how I got Poe ...

Gordon Poe?

Gotcha. Curt Fee the singer, Gordon Fee the theologian. Ah, what an honor to have Gordon Fee part of these discussions. I can see it now "Gordon Fee, do you believe women should have long, uncut hair for special angelic power?"

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by mizpeh

You should check out Dulle's blog. He has a lot to say about evolution and design.

What's up with you being so concerned about always looking "silly"? Atheists think Deists look silly, does that make us wrong for believing in God?

You're a deist now?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by DAII

I think Dulle is on the verge of trying to hybridize Apostolic theology with more mainstream theology ... but just not there yet.

I interested in some of his soteriological views ... as they are very Segravian in perspective ...

Most definitely doesn't see the rest of the Body as necessarily lost ... imo.

Would love him or Garner to debate/"discuss with" the likes of Bernard on Holiness standards.

Heck, I'd do it.

He has some great thoughts on a number of subjects. I was just struck by how he took a "short cut" and copied the pathetic quote mining trick.

Does he really think Lenski believes he has "disproven" Natural Selection? What's Lenski say on the matter?

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Lenski_affair

Very lame.

And, it does make all Oneness people look ridiculous when bubbleheads do the cut-and-paste without first grappling with the issue. DO NOT cut-and-paste or even buy into the so-called "Creationist" literature without first studying the issue. Ann Coulter did this in her book "Godless" and discredited herself badly.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

He has some great thoughts on a number of subjects. I was just struck by how he took a "short cut" and copied the pathetic quote mining trick.

Does he really think Lenski believes he has "disproven" Natural Selection? What's Lenski say on the matter?

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Lenski_affair

Very lame.

And, it does make all Oneness people look ridiculous when bubbleheads do the cut-and-paste without first grappling with the issue. DO NOT cut-and-paste or even buy into the so-called "Creationist" literature without first studying the issue. Ann Coulter did this in her book "Godless" and discredited herself badly.

Pel, have you chimed in over there?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Pel, have you chimed in over there?

On the "rationalwiki.com"? No.

While I do share an interest in being "rational" - I don't quite see how that should interfere with one's faith either.

Besides, I post here and just one other place. I don't have time to keep up with a series of running gun battles all over the interwebs.

If my post count here goes down Renda quits signing the checks.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

On the "rationalwiki.com"? No.

While I do share an interest in being "rational" - I don't quite see how that should interfere with one's faith either.

Besides, I post here and just one other place. I don't have time to keep up with a series of running gun battles all over the interwebs.

If my post count here goes down Renda quits signing the checks.

Ha. So that's a "no?"

You'd have some valuable contributions I believe.

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by pelathais

You're a deist now?

Theist, I meant theist!