So are you saying my post should be deleted or edited?? Is it official now...you want something deleted/edited? I just wanna make sure before I yell at you.
I did report your post. I think it was mean spirited, and I think you intended it to be that way. You owe Standards an apology--especially since he quickly retracted HIS statement and apologized per your *ahem* gentle insistence.
Quote:
Everyone is smart in their own way, including those who demonstrate "blithering stupidity"! (but you're pushing it)
MMMMmmmmmkay.
Quote:
What's prohibited on NotofWorks Friends Forum is name-calling. Stating that someone illustrated blithering stupidity is NOT name-calling. I don't believe "Standards" is stupid.
Ok....now what would you like to bash me for?
Nothing.
I disagree with your definition of name-calling. Calling someone stupid can be done outright or it can be done cleverly. It's a deliberate insult either way.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
I quoted the exchange. do you deny requesting "it' be stuck and then that you answered my two part question related to both "it" and where "it" should be stuck with the word "ear"?
YES!!!! Stick IT in his ears....not his ears in his ears. Good heavens.
Are you being serious here or are you just playing with me???? I said , "Stick it" as in "Stick it in your ears." I never said, implied, hinted at, or anything else that he should stick his EARS IN HIS EARS. I have no clue where you're getting that from.
I'm starting to think you're just yanking my chain.
Look, YOU are the one who said "stick it"
You did not clarify what was to be stuck, nor where you wanted it placed.
when I queried you on the matter you said “ears”
What other conclusion was I to draw? It was a very violent comment was it not?
Certainly in light of your willingness to “report a post” in this thread, one would assume you would not be so offensive.
Ears are people too you know.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
You did not clarify what was to be stuck, nor where you wanted it placed.
when I queried you on the matter you said “ears”
What other conclusion was I to draw? It was a very violent comment was it not?
Certainly in light of your willingness to “report a post” in this thread, one would assume you would not be so offensive.
Ears are people too you know.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Okay guys, your point is taken. Upset with his confrontation of the hoax poster, Standards, you took something he said, exaggerated it to make a point, then ganged up to go the distance with it. I think it's expended enough pages now.
Location: just north of the celtics red sox and patriots go baby!
Posts: 730
Re: Statement by Bro. Steve Pixler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Standards
He shaves his legs and he is proud of it.
So, its called manscaping. Big deal, ive seen men who had more hair on their backs than 50 men have on their whole bodies.Its gotta be hot in the summer and miserable all year. Manscaping isnt a gay thing exclusively.Get into the 21st century.
I think it was mean spirited, and I think you intended it to be that way. You owe Standards an apology--especially since he quickly retracted HIS statement and apologized per your *ahem* gentle insistence.
MMMMmmmmmkay.
Nothing.
I disagree with your definition of name-calling. Calling someone stupid can be done outright or it can be done cleverly. It's a deliberate insult either way.
My dear Sis., clever name-calling happens here on NotofWorks Friends Forum about every 5 posts, in case you haven't noticed.
No, I owe no apology to "Standards." He's not even real. He's a caricature of an ultra-con and posts under several IDs, including "Proudparent." I've apologized many times on this forum and I have no problem doing so when I'm wrong or have been offensive. That's not the case here.
If however, I inadvertently offended you here, I apologize. (yep)
When the government needs to take an action that will be unpopular or even damaging to its reputation, it will often use a ruse to shield itself from any connection to the act it has in fact perpetrated.
The term used for such a ruse is “Plausible deniability”
I believe we have seen this twice in this thread from my good friend from the left coast.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
When the government needs to take an action that will be unpopular or even damaging to its reputation, it will often use a ruse to shield itself from any connection to the act it has in fact perpetrated.
The term used for such a ruse is “Plausible deniability”
I believe we have seen this twice in this thread from my good friend from the left coast.
Huh?
And take it easy you land rat before you start making fun of the West Coast.
MMMMmmmmmkay. 
Linear Mode
