Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover
No one has addressed my question.
It is not ME who is saying there is no evidence. I am saying IF they do have the evidence then they should be going after the criminals - not taking mammas away from their children. (unless there is evidence that implicates a mother)
|
I think the premise would be that since this is a compound, making it one property, when they have evidence (ie. pregnant children) of abuse, by law all children would have to be removed and checked out to see if they were OK.
*Anyone who knows differently, feel free to correct me. This is my understanding of the situation.