In his typical "guilt by association" ploys, in which last year .... it was going emergent may lead to ministers going gay ...
The insinuation or at least stigma ... of being bi-sexual, gay et al is linked to women wearing pants ...
From his latest blog:
Quote:
Women in pants is a fairly recent trend
It is illegal for women to wear pants in Tucson, AZ (unless it has been changed recently). In 1997 California passed a law legalizing women wearing pants. In the 1930 movie, Morocco, Marlene Dietrich wore pants and kissed a woman.
(Source: http://gizardboy1990.tripod.com/id45.html)
Why do you think those cities and states passed the law in the first place? They evidently knew from the Word and from nature that it was wrong and would invite rebellion and other problems. Did Dietrich break a cultural taboo and begin a fad? Evidently. Other Internet sources say Dietrich was bi-sexual. Anyone surprised?
Do you think the traditional Christian influence in America and Western Europe delayed the practice of women wearing men’s apparel? With professing Christian women adopting the practice today, what denomination, organization or movement represents the last bastion of common sense on this toxic issue? Three guesses and the last two don’t count.
|
BTW, Snopes has dispelled the myth perpetuated by the likes of Ensey.
Quote:
In Tucson, it is illegal for women to wear pants.
No, Tucson has no such law. A century ago, it was a misdemeanor offense there for a person to appear in public in the dress "not of his or her sex," a law which presumably could have been applied to women wearing pants, but neither women nor pants were specifically mentioned.
|
http://www.snopes.com/legal/arizona.asp
Threaded Mode
