Quote:
Originally Posted by BeenThinkin
Well JD it's great that you finally got over "blaming Bush!" But if Obama had kept his word we wouldn't even be in that area. Everybody would be back home and we would be probably dodging terrorists bombings daily.
Yep! Mr Pannetta was so good he's being moved on to something else.
Let me see if I understand this. All the intel that they used has been totally discovered since Obama came into office. Nothing was gathered during any of the time Bush was in office?
Did they gather any info from the prisoners in Gitmo? Who put the prisoners in Gitmo? If Obama had had his way there wouldn't be any prisoners in Gitmo to gather info from.
Go ahead and drink your lemonade, JD. And support your man! (I know you're supposedly Republican...but who could tell?)
Been Thinkin
|
How do you guys make this stuff up? Obama has been consistently saying that he wants to focus on the war on terror, and to that end he was scaling back in Iraq (which he saw as a distraction from the real war on terror) and
focusing on the Afghan/Pakistan area. He has always called for increased presence and activity in Afghanistan and Pakistan as that represented a larger, real danger to us.
I think it just weakens arguments on either side when you just revise history and throw it out there. I'm just standing up to point it out because very few people here will because I guess it would involve crossing the party line in some way.
Threaded Mode
