|
Re: A Alternative Godhead View.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009
Ok, well it should be said that God is multi-dimensional "in my house there are many rooms," but also that after you have
figured out, what you have just said about multi-headed is true, in a sense, in that one is one, and after that are offices, descriptions of manifestations, what you will. Getting lost in the details, not that the Trinity isn't a pretty manifestational detail. Don't forget to include, in your hybrid, that no man can intelligentify God into any quanta, k?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009
Lol, actually it is the only way that will not adhere to our current way of thinking, if you see what I mean; our collective symbols are not adequate, and so anything illuminating is going to appear...like that. Speaking in tongues, and you then have to test it for yourself.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009
Maybe not, to you? What makes no sense?
|
That.
Who said anything about multi-headed anything until you did. And what does it refer to/relate to/have to do with? What does "in my house are many rooms" have to do with the Godhead? Intelligentify? Quanta? Yes, I know what you mean by these words...but why use them on a discussion forum?? (and is intelligentify even a word?)
I have absolutely no idea what your second post is about. What is the only way that it will not adhere to our current way of thinking? Our collective symbols are not adequate? ???????
The last post actually seems coherent.
__________________
"If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn’t help the poor, either we’ve got to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we’ve got to acknowledge that he commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition — and then admit that we just don’t want to do it."
-Steven Colbert
|
Threaded Mode
