|
Re: Bernard continues his rewrite of UPC history
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple
I can see why Bernard would strongly teach Acts 2:38 is the new birth. What if he told people they are born again without being baptized in water? Or in the Holy Ghost? Then if they did not follow through (this happens many times) and they died lost he would feel responsible. To me its not "harsh" to teach what the Apostles taught from the beginning. It is dangerous to NOT teach it. |
Your missing the point. This is a historical issue not whether the water and spirit interpretation is correct.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
|
Threaded Mode
