Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I didn't see any tweets and only a few photos posted here without captions
I dont see using other images as unethical when they are not copy written. I do see mis-representing them as something they are not as unethical but I am willing to give someone the benefit of the doubt that it was not their intent.
It could be just a case of thoughtlessness...which as evidenced from this topic, is quite common.
|
It could be you're right. I dont know exactly what was said on the minister's forum after this was highlighted. I saw the tweets yes. On the forum it is said that he had real photos a few weeks later, but I didnt see any pictures anywhere prior to August, 2014 - a year later.
Often a clear, detailed explanation removes all doubt and rights to doubt. What one does not say is often as important as what one does say. Not a single word about it before it was exposed and then there was no explanation, at least not a public one, provided. The explanation that was provided was taken from a forum that nobody but fellow ministers can view. Since no doubt has been cast, at least not publicly, it is difficult to generate the benefit of it. Its his job to cast it, not these two or three on this forum.
Threaded Mode
