Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Pitta
That is a fair statement. Manuscripts are weighed and counted, not just counted.
There is a considerable amount of examination given to textual variants. But not to the comma in question. It lacks the evidence needed for inclusion. Is it an old rating ? Yes. Does it have the support it need for inclusion ? I think not.
|
Upon what basis do you judge it as uninspired? Please lay out the case as to why, whereas other verses with little mss. evidence are inspired.
Threaded Mode
