Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny
And I could just as equally say that according to you and other's, once a person "accepts Christ" they have license to sin.
|
About that "accepts Christ" nonsense ... I don't believe it. Water and Spirit. New birth experience.
Acts 2:38. 3-stepper. All of the above (except for that "accepting Christ" nonsense.) Try again.
Nor do I believe a Christian has a license to sin - not even newborn ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny
The OT is abrogated and of no further use and should never be read or studies.
|
Who ever said that? An extreme exaggeration. I have argued that if you're going to claim
Deuteronomy 22:5 is applicable for today, you better also follow the other dietary laws and customs, including the feasts and Passover. But I don't believe anyone has claimed what you posted here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny
The only thing that matters is, well, nothing because they will never be held accountable for sin.
|
Pretty sure Aquila believes there are wages to sin. I do.
You believe women wearing pants is a sin. You've spent dozens of pages and probably close to a hundred posts or more proclaiming how Godly women do not wear pants. Yet you refuse to connect the dots and follow the path from sin to death. If you believe women wearing pants is a sin, then they are (if they do not repent and begin wearing only dresses) headed for an eternity in hell.
Why is this so hard for you?
Threaded Mode
