1Co11.2-16. Instincts. The Cover of Shame.

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Since Don is trying to bring guilt through association I need to answer this trash.
Don, I used the quote. Therefore I needed to mention the individual who made the quote. I agree with the quote, not the author of the quote. Since you could never win a fair fight with anyone you look for garbage. Therefore you proved to me once again, that while you aren’t a Christian, you aren’t a man. I will no longer address you for any reason. You are a coward. Contemplate this on the tree of woe.

This post is about the use of nastiness. Don't waste your time reading this. This is mostly about Dom and Don.

You're right, Dom, I used the guilt by association tactic. You also used this tactic in post 491, by quoting Ro1.18-23 at me, without comment. I have a great teacher and example in your ways.

Dom, are you a disciple of Branham, errr, sorry, I mean Kevin Alfred Strom. (see post 498 and https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.co....php?t=55138Do for clarification.) Do you go to a Branhamite church, errr, sorry again, I mean meetings where the teachings of Kevin Alfred Strom are taught? (Doing something like this is fun when it is you doing it to others, right Dom? But not fun when someone does this to you?)

(see posts 425, 447, 450, 470, 477 for background info, where Dom uses Branham's name)

Thank you for setting the record straight, Dom, about Kevin Alfred Strom. Just by my quoting you quoting Kevin Alfred Strom, can lead to misunderstandings of you. Explanations must be made. Without such explanations you can be seen as favourable to all of Kevin Alfred Strom views. You've done a good thing for yourself and truth.

But why didn't you use a private message, Dom, when I suggested you do so, to clarify this? (Answer: because this is about Dom's public/AFF reputation. And does Dom care about another person's public reputation when he says nasty things of them in public? No, the nasty words flow easily from him then. In Dom's world the nastiness can only flow in one direction. You know which direction, don't you, Reader.)

Reader, Benincasa hasn't provided explanations why he rejects the iv. See a compilation of his comments in post 342, this man with great Biblical and worldly religion knowledge. I don't say this facetiously. Just read his many posts in AFF! You can see from his defence of himself in post 499, how easily a simple explanation can be made. Why he hasn't provided many simple anti-iv comments from reason or scripture, when it is so easy to do so, will remain a mystery for now.

Let's hope that he will yet provide explanations. But don't hold your breath for this. If he had been able to use arguments from reason, as he did with his defence of himself in the quote from Kevin Alfred Strom, then he would already have done so against the iv. When he hasn't, then he wants you to believe the iv is wrong just because he says so. Just because he thinks himself as The Authority, and then indicates this by doing so!

Dom is like a nasty school boy who uses dirty words. He calls me garbage, coward, and an unfair fighter, not a Christian or a man. Your colours are showing, Dom, when you say things like this. He likes to dish out negatives but cries like a baby (sorry babies for making you look bad) when someone gives it back. (Jas3.13 Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show by good conduct that his works are done in the meekness of wisdom. 14 But if you have bitter envy and self-seeking in your hearts, do not boast and lie against the truth. 15 This wisdom does not descend from above, but is earthly, sensual, demonic. 16 For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there. 17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy. 18 Now the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace.)

You know what people say: big people talk about ideas and small people talk about other people. Dom is small people kind of person, when he usually only says negative things of me, without discussing the iv or any other head-covering view. Plz see my commentary, over 10,00 words, for an example of me as a big people kind of person. I present arguments from reason, not nasty words.

Reader, you didn't get this far in life by not using your noodle. I'm sure you'll not be swayed by those like Benincasa, who dish out negatives without also giving theological thoughts from reason and scripture. He, this Authority, thinks you'll be persuaded about the iv or me, by nastiness alone.